Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.08680

Online Dependent Rounding Schemes for Bipartite Matchings, with Applications

Abstract

We introduce the abstract problem of rounding an unknown fractional bipartite $b$-matching $\bf{x}$ revealed online (e.g., output by an online fractional algorithm), exposed node-by-node on~one~side. The objective is to maximize the \emph{rounding ratio} of the output matching $M$, which is the minimum over all fractional $b$-matchings $\bf{x}$, and edges $e$, of the ratio $\Pr[e\in M]/x_e$. In analogy with the highly influential offline dependent rounding schemes of Gandhi et al.~(FOCS'02, JACM'06), we refer to such algorithms as \emph{online dependent rounding schemes} (ODRSes). This problem, with additional restrictions on the possible inputs $\bf{x}$, has played a key role in recent developments in online computing. We provide the first generic $b$-matching ODRSes that impose no restrictions on $\bf{x}$. Specifically, we provide ODRSes with rounding ratios of $0.646$ and $0.652$ for $b$-matchings and simple matchings, respectively. This breaks the natural barrier of $1-1/e$, prevalent for online matching problems, and numerous online problems more broadly. Using our ODRSes, we provide a number of algorithms with similar better-than-$(1-1/e)$ ratios for several problems in online edge coloring, stochastic optimization, and more. Our techniques, which have already found applications in several follow-up works (Patel and Wajc SODA'24, Blikstad et al.~SODA'25, Braverman et al.~SODA'25, and Aouad et al.~2024), include periodic use of \emph{offline} contention resolution schemes (in online algorithm design), grouping nodes, and a new scaling method which we call \emph{group discount and individual markup}.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Joseph, Naor, Aravind Srinivasan, David Wajc. 2023-01-20. Online Dependent Rounding Schemes for Bipartite Matchings, with Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS