Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2301.11383

Tensor products and intertwining operators between two uniserial representations of the Galilean Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$

Abstract

Let $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$, $n\ge 1$, be the Galilean Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero, here $\mathfrak{h}_{n}$ is the Heisenberg Lie algebra of dimension $2n+1$, and $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ acts on $\mathfrak{h}_{n}$ so that $\mathfrak{h}_n\simeq V(2n-1)\oplus V(0)$ as $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-modules (here $V(k)$ denotes the irreducible $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-module of highest weight $k$). In this paper, we study the tensor product of two uniserial representations of $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$. We obtain the $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-module structure of the socle of $V\otimes W$ and we describe the space of intertwining operators $\text{Hom}_{\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n}(V,W)$, where $V$ and $W$ are uniserial representations of $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$. The structure of the radical of $V\otimes W$ follows from that of the socle of $V^*\otimes W^*$. The result is subtle and shows how difficult is to obtain the whole socle series of arbitrary tensor products of uniserials. In contrast to the serial associative case, our results for $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$ reveal that these tensor products are far from being a direct sum of uniserials; in particular, there are cases in which the tensor product of two uniserial $\big(\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n\big)$-modules is indecomposable but not uniserial. Recall that a foundational result of T. Nakayama states that every finitely generated module over a serial associative algebra is a direct sum of uniserial modules. This article extends a previous work in which we obtained the corresponding results for the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{a}_m$ where $\mathfrak{a}_m$ is the abelian Lie algebra of dimension $m+1$ and $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ acts so that $\mathfrak{a}_m\simeq V(m)$ as $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-modules.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leandro Cagliero, Iván Gómez Rivera. 2024-05-31. Tensor products and intertwining operators between two uniserial representations of the Galilean Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-024-01439-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A local relative trace formula for F*\SL(2,F)

In this note, we derive explicitly the local relative trace formula for the symmetric space F*\SL(2,F) at the level of Lie algebras, where F is a p-adic field of residue characteristic greater than two and F* is the set of invertible elements in F. This is perhaps one of the simplest non-trivial analogs of the trace formula, and also a motivating example for the author's work (in preparation) on the relative trace formula.

math.RT

Semi-infinite parabolic IC-sheaf

Let G be a connected reductive group, P its parabolic subgroup. We consider the parabolic semi-infinite category of sheaves on the affine Grassmanian of G and construct the parabolic version of the semi-infinite IC-sheaf of each orbit. We establish some of its properties and relate it to sheaves on the Drinfeld compactification of the moduli stack Bun_P of P-torsors on a curve. We also relate the parabolic semi-infinite IC-sheaf with the dual baby Verma object on the spectral side.

math.RT

The Grothendieck group of an extriangulated category

In this paper, we investigate the split Grothendieck group $K^{\rm sp}_{0}(\mathcal{M})$ of a $d$-rigid subcategory $\mathcal{M}$ in an extriangulated category $\mathscr{C}$. As applications, we prove the following results: (1) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a silting subcategory, then the Grothendieck group $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to $K_{0}^{\rm sp}(\mathcal{M})$; (2) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a $d$-cluster tilting subcategory, then $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to the index Grothendieck group $K_{0}^{\rm in}(\mathcal{M})$; (3) Let $\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d}$ be the $d$-cluster category of type $A_n$. If $d$ is even, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}/(n+1)\mathbb{Z}$. If $d$ is odd, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}$ if $n$ is odd; $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong 0$ if $n$ is even.

math.RT