Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2302.12440

Optimal Bounds for Noisy Sorting

Abstract

Sorting is a fundamental problem in computer science. In the classical setting, it is well-known that $(1\pm o(1)) n\log_2 n$ comparisons are both necessary and sufficient to sort a list of $n$ elements. In this paper, we study the Noisy Sorting problem, where each comparison result is flipped independently with probability $p$ for some fixed $p\in (0, \frac 12)$. As our main result, we show that $$(1\pm o(1)) \left( \frac{1}{I(p)} + \frac{1}{(1-2p) \log_2 \left(\frac{1-p}p\right)} \right) n\log_2 n$$ noisy comparisons are both necessary and sufficient to sort $n$ elements with error probability $o(1)$ using noisy comparisons, where $I(p)=1 + p\log_2 p+(1-p)\log_2 (1-p)$ is capacity of BSC channel with crossover probability $p$. This simultaneously improves the previous best lower and upper bounds (Wang, Ghaddar and Wang, ISIT 2022) for this problem. For the related Noisy Binary Search problem, we show that $$ (1\pm o(1)) \left((1-\delta)\frac{\log_2(n)}{I(p)} + \frac{2 \log_2 \left(\frac 1\delta\right)}{(1-2p)\log_2\left(\frac {1-p}p\right)}\right) $$ noisy comparisons are both necessary and sufficient to find the predecessor of an element among $n$ sorted elements with error probability $\delta$. This extends the previous bounds of (Burnashev and Zigangirov, 1974), which are only tight for $\delta = 1/n^{o(1)}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuzhou Gu, Yinzhan Xu. 2023-02-24. Optimal Bounds for Noisy Sorting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12440

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS