Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2302.12811

$k$-Center Clustering with Outliers in the MPC and Streaming Model

Abstract

Given a point set $P \subseteq X$ of size $n$ in a metric space $(X,dist)$ of doubling dimension $d$ and two parameters $k \in N$ and $z \in N$, the $k$-center problem with $z$ outliers asks to return a set $C^\ast \subseteq X$ of $k$ centers such that the maximum distance of all but $z$ points of $P$ to their nearest center in $C^\ast$ is minimized. An $(ε,k,z)$-coreset for this problem is a weighted point set $P^*$ such that an optimal solution for the $k$-center problem with $z$ outliers on $P^*$ gives a $(1\pmε)$-approximation for the $k$-center problem with $z$ outliers on $P$. We study the construction of such coresets in the Massively Parallel Computing (MPC) model, and in the insertion-only as well as the fully dynamic streaming model. We obtain the following results, for any given $0 < ε\le 1$: In all cases, the size of the computed coreset is $O(k/ε^d+z)$. - In the MPC model, we present a deterministic $2$-round and a randomized $1$-round algorithm. Additionally, we provide a deterministic algorithm that obtains a trade-off between the number of rounds, $R$, and the storage per machine. - For the insertion-only streaming model, we present an algorithm and a tight lower bound to support it. - We also discuss the dynamic streaming model, which allows both insertions and deletions in the data stream. In this model, we present the first algorithm and a lower bound. - Finally, we consider the sliding window model, where we are interested in maintaining an $(ε,k,z)$-coreset for the last $W$ points in the stream, we present a tight lower bound that confirms the optimality of the previous work by De Berg, Monemizadeh, and Zhong (ESA2020).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark de Berg, Leyla Biabani, Morteza Monemizadeh. 2023-02-24. $k$-Center Clustering with Outliers in the MPC and Streaming Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12811

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS