Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2302.14844

Student Sense-Making in Post-Secondary Introductory Proof Courses: An Argument for and Outline of a Methodological Approach

Abstract

While proof is a central component of postsecondary mathematical study, proof construction has historically posed significant difficulties for students who intend to earn mathematics degrees at the undergraduate level. This work is comprised of detailed literature reviews, an argument for a methodological approach, and a descriptive research plan to study how university students use their mathematical discourse to interpret proof tasks and ultimately engage in constructing proofs in response to these tasks. The theoretical outcomes of using the approach outlined therein are: (a) theorized models of undergraduate students' patterned mathematical activity in response to proof tasks; (b) identified words, phrases, or problem features that evoke this patterned activity; and (c) identified similarities and differences in students' descriptions of their uses for mathematical concepts vs. how instructors expect students to think about and use mathematical concepts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bolanle Salaam. 2023-02-25. Student Sense-Making in Post-Secondary Introductory Proof Courses: An Argument for and Outline of a Methodological Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14844

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO