Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2303.11843

Optimal Fully Dynamic $k$-Center Clustering for Adaptive and Oblivious Adversaries

Abstract

In fully dynamic clustering problems, a clustering of a given data set in a metric space must be maintained while it is modified through insertions and deletions of individual points. In this paper, we resolve the complexity of fully dynamic $k$-center clustering against both adaptive and oblivious adversaries. Against oblivious adversaries, we present the first algorithm for fully dynamic $k$-center in an arbitrary metric space that maintains an optimal $(2+ε)$-approximation in $O(k \cdot \mathrm{polylog}(n,Δ))$ amortized update time. Here, $n$ is an upper bound on the number of active points at any time, and $Δ$ is the aspect ratio of the metric space. Previously, the best known amortized update time was $O(k^2\cdot \mathrm{polylog}(n,Δ))$, and is due to Chan, Gourqin, and Sozio (2018). Moreover, we demonstrate that our runtime is optimal up to $\mathrm{polylog}(n,Δ)$ factors. In fact, we prove that even offline algorithms for $k$-clustering tasks in arbitrary metric spaces, including $k$-medians, $k$-means, and $k$-center, must make at least $Ω(n k)$ distance queries to achieve any non-trivial approximation factor. This implies a lower bound of $Ω(k)$ which holds even for the insertions-only setting. We also show deterministic lower and upper bounds for adaptive adversaries, demonstrate that an update time sublinear in $k$ is possible against oblivious adversaries for metric spaces which admit locally sensitive hash functions (LSH) and give the first fully dynamic $O(1)$-approximation algorithms for the closely related $k$-sum-of-radii and $k$-sum-of-diameter problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

MohammadHossein Bateni, Hossein Esfandiari, Hendrik Fichtenberger, Monika Henzinger, Rajesh Jayaram, Vahab Mirrokni, Andreas Wiese. 2023-03-21. Optimal Fully Dynamic $k$-Center Clustering for Adaptive and Oblivious Adversaries. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch101

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS

Linear-Query Deterministic Approximation for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under a Knapsack Constraint

Submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint (SMK) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with broad applications across machine learning and data mining. Motivated by large-scale applications where query efficiency is paramount, we study non-monotone SMK and focus on deterministic algorithms with linear query complexity. Prior deterministic linear-query algorithms achieve at best a $1/5-\varepsilon$ approximation, falling short of the $1/4-\varepsilon$ ratio attainable by randomized algorithms. We close this gap by presenting a deterministic $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation with $O(n\log^2(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries. Our approach partitions the analysis based on the cost of the largest optimal element $r$: when the cost of $r$ is moderate, we refine the threshold-twin-greedy framework via residual-budget enumeration to tighten the analysis; when the cost of $r$ is large, we reduce the problem to bicriteria submodular maximization. As a secondary contribution, we obtain a $(1/2-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon))$-bicriteria approximation with $O(n\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, improving over the previous $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ query bound.

cs.DS