Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2304.00139

Classification Strength of Polish Groups: Involving $S_\infty$

Abstract

In recent years, much work has been done to measure and compare the complexity of orbit equivalence relations, especially for certain classes of Polish groups. We start by introducing some language to organize this previous work, namely the notion of \textbf{classification strength} of Polish groups. Broadly speaking, a Polish group $G$ has stronger classification strength than $H$ if every orbit equivalence relation induced by a continuous action of $H$ on a Polish space can be ``emulated" by such an action of $G$ in the sense of Borel reduction. Among the non-Archimedean Polish groups, the groups with the highest classification strength are those that involve $S_\infty$, the Polish group of permutations of a countably-infinite set. We prove that several properties, including a weakening of the disjoint amalgamation in Fraïssé theory, a weakening of the existence of an absolute set of generating indiscernibles, and not having ordinal rank in a particular coanalytic rank function, are all equivalent to a non-Archimedean Polish group involving $S_\infty$. Furthermore, we show the equivalence relation $=^+$, which is a relatively simple benchmark equivalence relation in the theory of Borel reducibility, can only be classified by such groups that involve $S_\infty$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shaun Allison. 2026-05-12. Classification Strength of Polish Groups: Involving $S_\infty$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00139

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO