Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.11325

Deterministic identity testing paradigms for bounded top-fanin depth-4 circuits

Pranjal Dutta·Prateek Dwivedi·Nitin Saxena
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT) is a fundamental computational problem. The famous depth-$4$ reduction result by Agrawal and Vinay (FOCS 2008) has made PIT for depth-$4$ circuits an enticing pursuit. A restricted depth-4 circuit computing a $n$-variate degree-$d$ polynomial of the form $\sum_{i = 1}^{k} \prod_{j} g_{ij}$, where $°g_{ij} \leq δ$ is called $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣΠ^{[δ]}$ circuit. On further restricting $g_{ij}$ to be sum of univariates we obtain $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣ\wedge$ circuits. The largely open, special-cases of $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣΠ^{[δ]}$ for constant $k$ and $δ$, and $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣ\wedge$ have been a source of many great ideas in the last two decades. For eg. depth-$3$ ideas of Dvir and Shpilka (STOC 2005), Kayal and Saxena (CCC 2006), and Saxena and Seshadhri (FOCS 2010 and STOC 2011). Further, depth-$4$ ideas of Beecken, Mittmann and Saxena (ICALP 2011), Saha, Saxena and Saptharishi (Comput.Compl. 2013), Forbes (FOCS 2015), and Kumar and Saraf (CCC 2016). Additionally, geometric Sylvester-Gallai ideas of Kayal and Saraf (FOCS 2009), Shpilka (STOC 2019), and Peleg and Shpilka (CCC 2020, STOC 2021). Very recently, a subexponential-time blackbox PIT algorithm for constant-depth circuits was obtained via lower bound breakthrough of Limaye, Srinivasan, Tavenas (FOCS 2021). We solve two of the basic underlying open problems in this work. We give the first polynomial-time PIT for $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣ\wedge$. We also give the first quasipolynomial time blackbox PIT for both $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣ\wedge$ and $Σ^{[k]}ΠΣΠ^{[δ]}$. A key technical ingredient in all the three algorithms is how the logarithmic derivative, and its power-series, modify the top $Π$-gate to $\wedge$.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCcs.SCmath.AC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pranjal Dutta, Prateek Dwivedi, Nitin Saxena. 2023-04-22. Deterministic identity testing paradigms for bounded top-fanin depth-4 circuits. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.ccc.2021.11

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC↗