Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2304.11856

Portfolio Optimization using Predictive Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Networks with Measuring Uncertainty

Abstract

In financial engineering, portfolio optimization has been of consistent interest. Portfolio optimization is a process of modulating asset distributions to maximize expected returns and minimize risks. To obtain the expected returns, deep learning models have been explored in recent years. However, due to the deterministic nature of the models, it is difficult to consider the risk of portfolios because conventional deep learning models do not know how reliable their predictions can be. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a probabilistic model, namely predictive auxiliary classifier generative adversarial networks (PredACGAN). The proposed PredACGAN utilizes the characteristic of the ACGAN framework in which the output of the generator forms a distribution. While ACGAN has not been employed for predictive models and is generally utilized for image sample generation, this paper proposes a method to use the ACGAN structure for a probabilistic and predictive model. Additionally, an algorithm to use the risk measurement obtained by PredACGAN is proposed. In the algorithm, the assets that are predicted to be at high risk are eliminated from the investment universe at the rebalancing moment. Therefore, PredACGAN considers both return and risk to optimize portfolios. The proposed algorithm and PredACGAN have been evaluated with daily close price data of S&P 500 from 1990 to 2020. Experimental scenarios are assumed to rebalance the portfolios monthly according to predictions and risk measures with PredACGAN. As a result, a portfolio using PredACGAN exhibits 9.123% yearly returns and a Sharpe ratio of 1.054, while a portfolio without considering risk measures shows 1.024% yearly returns and a Sharpe ratio of 0.236 in the same scenario. Also, the maximum drawdown of the proposed portfolio is lower than the portfolio without PredACGAN.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiwook Kim, Minhyeok Lee. 2023-04-24. Portfolio Optimization using Predictive Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Networks with Measuring Uncertainty. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11856

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM