Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2305.03919

DBAT: Dynamic Backward Attention Transformer for Material Segmentation with Cross-Resolution Patches

Abstract

The objective of dense material segmentation is to identify the material categories for every image pixel. Recent studies adopt image patches to extract material features. Although the trained networks can improve the segmentation performance, their methods choose a fixed patch resolution which fails to take into account the variation in pixel area covered by each material. In this paper, we propose the Dynamic Backward Attention Transformer (DBAT) to aggregate cross-resolution features. The DBAT takes cropped image patches as input and gradually increases the patch resolution by merging adjacent patches at each transformer stage, instead of fixing the patch resolution during training. We explicitly gather the intermediate features extracted from cross-resolution patches and merge them dynamically with predicted attention masks. Experiments show that our DBAT achieves an accuracy of 86.85%, which is the best performance among state-of-the-art real-time models. Like other successful deep learning solutions with complex architectures, the DBAT also suffers from lack of interpretability. To address this problem, this paper examines the properties that the DBAT makes use of. By analysing the cross-resolution features and the attention weights, this paper interprets how the DBAT learns from image patches. We further align features to semantic labels, performing network dissection, to infer that the proposed model can extract material-related features better than other methods. We show that the DBAT model is more robust to network initialisation, and yields fewer variable predictions compared to other models. The project code is available at https://github.com/heng-yuwen/Dynamic-Backward-Attention-Transformer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuwen Heng, Srinandan Dasmahapatra, Hansung Kim. 2024-02-28. DBAT: Dynamic Backward Attention Transformer for Material Segmentation with Cross-Resolution Patches. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03919

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV