Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2305.08354

Decoding Chinese phonemes from intracortical brain signals with hyperbolic-space neural representations

Abstract

Speech brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which translate brain signals into spoken words or sentences, have shown significant potential for high-performance BCI communication. Phonemes are the fundamental units of pronunciation in most languages. While existing speech BCIs have largely focused on English, where words contain diverse compositions of phonemes, Chinese Mandarin is a monosyllabic language, with words typically consisting of a consonant and a vowel. This feature makes it feasible to develop high-performance Mandarin speech BCIs by decoding phonemes directly from neural signals. This study aimed to decode spoken Mandarin phonemes using intracortical neural signals. We observed that phonemes with similar pronunciations were often represented by inseparable neural patterns, leading to confusion in phoneme decoding. This finding suggests that the neural representation of spoken phonemes has a hierarchical structure. To account for this, we proposed learning the neural representation of phoneme pronunciation in a hyperbolic space, where the hierarchical structure could be more naturally optimized. Experiments with intracortical neural signals from a Chinese participant showed that the proposed model learned discriminative and interpretable hierarchical phoneme representations from neural signals, significantly improving Chinese phoneme decoding performance and achieving state-of-the-art. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of constructing high-performance Chinese speech BCIs based on phoneme decoding.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xianhan Tan, Junming Zhu, Jianmin Zhang, Yueming Wang, Yu Qi. 2023-05-15. Decoding Chinese phonemes from intracortical brain signals with hyperbolic-space neural representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08354

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning Password Best Practices Through In-Task Instruction

Users often make security- and privacy-relevant decisions without a clear understanding of the rules that govern safe behavior. We introduce pedagogical friction, a design approach that inserts brief, instructional interactions at the moment of action. We evaluate this approach in the context of password creation, a familiar task with clear quality criteria. We conducted a randomized study with 128 participants across four interface conditions that varied the depth and interactivity of guidance. We assessed three outcomes: (1) rule compliance in a subsequent password task without guidance, (2) accuracy on survey questions tied to password rules, and (3) behavior-knowledge alignment, which captures whether participants who correctly followed a rule also recognized it on the survey. Across the guided conditions, participants corrected most rule violations in the follow-up task and showed high behavior-knowledge alignment. Survey results suggested clearer advantages for some rule types, especially symbol related questions. These results position pedagogical friction as a lightweight intervention for security- and privacy-critical interfaces.

cs.HC

Leveling the Playing Field: Temporal Video Segmentation for Individuals with ADHD in Computing Education

Individuals with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) often face significant barriers in computing education. In asynchronous learning environments, instructional videos can impose high extraneous cognitive load, often relying on assumptions about sustained attention and working memory that do not align with ADHD neurocognitive profiles. In this work, we evaluate a post-hoc video processing intervention that segments instructional content into single-instruction chunks followed by fixed-length pauses to reduce cognitive load. In a within-participants controlled study with 17 individuals with ADHD and 10 without, we find that the intervention has an equalizing effect. Although it improved performance for all participants, gains were larger for those with ADHD, reducing their errors and hesitations to levels comparable to those of participants without ADHD under the same intervention. These results align with the goals of Universal Design for Learning (UDL), by showing that cognitively-aligned, post-hoc instructional video modifications can reduce performance disparities across diverse neurocognitive profiles.

cs.HC

Human Driver Temperament and the Safety Impact of a C-V2X Denial-of-Service Flooding Attack in Mixed-Autonomy Traffic

Cooperative and connected automated vehicles (CAVs) rely on Signal Phase and Timing (SPaT) messages to cross signalized intersections; a denial-of-service (DoS) flood that blocks SPaT forces CAVs into a fail-safe mode. Because human-driven vehicles share the intersection, the safety consequence depends not only on the attack and the CAV fail-safe policy, but on how the surrounding human drivers behave. We investigate this human-factors dimension with a coupled OMNeT++/INET (5G NR-V2X) and SUMO microsimulation of a signalized corridor, sweeping CAV market penetration (10-90%), four calibrated driver temperaments (cautious to aggressive) and two standards-based fail-safe policies, a minimal-risk maneuver (MRM) and an adaptive cruise control (ACC) keep-driving fallback, with each attack arm differenced against its policy-matched no-attack baseline. Temperament's effect on the attack is specific and modest rather than a blanket amplification. Aggressive surroundings worsen one metric, the hard-braking a keep-driving fail-safe forces on nearby drivers (p = 0.03), rising from near zero to +8 episodes/1000 veh-s. They appear to dampen rear-end conflicts, but only because the flood clears the queues aggressive drivers build, so the gain is in flow, not safety. On the attack's primary signatures, CAV red-light running and crossing conflicts, temperament has no detectable effect. It instead dominates baseline risk, producing a 13- to 18-fold cautious-to-aggressive gradient far larger than the attack itself, which acts through a channel already congested by CAV adoption. Human driver populations determine how dangerous the intersection is but do not systematically amplify this attack, so fail-safe design cannot assume a cautious test population bounds the risk.

cs.HC