Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2305.08519

On generalized KKT points for the Motzkin-Straus program

Abstract

In 1965, T. S. Motzkin and E. G. Straus established an elegant connection between the clique number of a graph and the global maxima of a quadratic program defined on the standard simplex. Over the years, this seminal finding has inspired a number of studies aimed at characterizing the properties of the (local and global) solutions of the Motzkin-Straus program. The result has also been generalized in various ways and has served as the basis for establishing new bounds on the clique number and developing powerful clique-finding heuristics. Despite the extensive work done on the subject, apart from a few exceptions, the existing literature pays little or no attention to the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) points of the program. In the conviction that these points might reveal interesting structural properties of the graph underlying the program, this paper tries to fill in the gap. In particular, we study the generalized KKT points of a parameterized version of the Motzkin-Straus program, which are defined via a relaxation of the usual first-order optimality conditions, and we present a number of results that shed light on the symmetries and regularities of certain substructures associated with the underlying graph. These combinatorial structures are further analyzed using barycentric coordinates, thereby providing a link to a related quadratic program that encodes local structural properties of the graph. This turns out to be particularly useful in the study of the generalized KKT points associated with a certain class of graphs that generalize the notion of a star graph. Finally, we discuss the associations between the generalized KKT points of the Motzkin-Straus program and the so-called replicator dynamics, thereby offering an alternative, dynamical-system perspective on the results presented in the paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G. Beretta, A. Torcinovich, M. Pelillo. 2024-12-23. On generalized KKT points for the Motzkin-Straus program. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-024-01457-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic Programming-Compatible Uncertainty Sets in Robust Markov Decision Processes

In this paper, we investigate the compatibility of robust Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs) with dynamic programming under various assumptions on the uncertainty set, i.e., we investigate when one can solve an RMDP by solving a fixed point equation. We show that in all generality, s-rectangular and sa-rectangular uncertainty sets are the only models of uncertainty that are compatible with dynamic programming. Our analysis shows that existing non-rectangular models, including r-rectangularity, are only weakly compatible with dynamic programming, as they require the assumption that rewards do not depend on the next state. In this case, our results imply that one can always construct a rectangular uncertainty set that is equivalent, for both policy evaluation and optimization, to the dynamic programming-compatible non-rectangular model. This highlights a key limitation: dynamic-programming-compatible non-rectangular uncertainty sets, although practically relevant for uncertainty quantification, do not provide a genuinely distinct assessment of policy performance. Interestingly, our proof techniques rely on identifying a novel simultaneous solvability property, which we show is central to several important properties of RMDPs, including the existence of stationary optimal policies and dynamic programming-based formulations. The simultaneous solvability property enables a unified approach to studying all existing models of uncertainty, rectangular and non-rectangular alike.

math.OC

A simple and practical adaptive trust-region method

We present an adaptive trust-region method for unconstrained optimization that allows inexact solutions to the trust-region subproblems. Our method is a simple variant of the classical trust-region method of Ssorensen. The method achieves the best possible convergence bound up to an additive logarithmic term for finding an $ε$-approximate stationary point, i.e., $O( Δ_f L^{1/2} ε^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1)$ iterations, where $L$ is the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian, $Δ_f$ is the optimality gap, and $ε$ is the termination tolerance for the gradient norm. This improves over existing trust-region methods whose worst-case bound is at least a factor of $L$ worse. We compare our performance with state-of-the-art trust-region (TRU) and cubic regularization (ARC) methods from the GALAHAD library on the CUTEst benchmark problems with at least 100 variables. We also compare with the recently developed Universal trust-region (UTR) method, using the same subproblem solver. In terms of shifted geometric mean of wall-clock times our method's is between $1.2\times$ and $2\times$ faster. We report similar improvements for number of function evaluations, factorizations, gradient evaluations and Hessian evaluations. Compared to the conference version of this paper, our revised method includes several practical enhancements. These modifications dramatically improved performance, including almost an order of magnitude reduction in the shifted geometric mean of wall-clock times. We also show that it suffices for the function to be continuously twice-differentiable to guarantee that either the minimum gradient norm converges to zero or the objective value tends towards negative infinity, even when the iterates diverge.

math.OC

Rough Stochastic Pontryagin Maximum Principle and an Indirect Shooting Method

We derive first-order Pontryagin optimality conditions for stochastic optimal control with deterministic controls for systems modeled by rough differential equations (RDE) driven by Gaussian rough paths. This Pontryagin Maximum Principle (PMP) applies to systems following stochastic differential equations (SDE) driven by Brownian motion, yet it does not rely on forward-backward SDEs and involves the same Hamiltonian as the deterministic PMP. The proof consists of first deriving various integrable error bounds for solutions to nonlinear and linear RDEs by leveraging recent results on Gaussian rough paths. The PMP then follows using standard techniques based on needle-like variations. As an application, we propose the first indirect shooting method for nonlinear stochastic optimal control and show that it converges 10x faster than a direct method on a stabilization task.

math.OC