arXiv · 2305.11190
Statistical and Observation Comparison of Weyl-Type $f(Q,T)$ Models with the $Λ$CDM Paradigm
Abstract
We study the $f(Q,T)$ gravity in the framework of Weyl geometry (known as Weyl-type $f(Q,T)$ gravity), where $Q$ denotes the non-metricity scalar, and $T$ denotes the energy-momentum tensor trace. In this work, we consider the $f(Q,T)$ model, which is defined as $f(Q,T)=αQ^{m+1}+\fracβ{6κ^2}T$ and investigating two scenarios: $(I)$ $m=0$ (linear model) and $(II)$ $m\neq 0$ (nonlinear model). For both scenarios, we find the explicit solution for the field equations by using the barotropic equation of state as $p=wρ$, where $w$ is the equation-of-state (EoS) parameter. Further, we study the obtained solutions statistically using the $Pantheon^+$ (Without SHOES Calibrated) dataset with 1701 data points. For both models, the best-fit values of model parameters for $1-σ$ and $2-σ$ confidence level. The higher Hubble constant values in both models emphasize the presence of Tension. We statistically compare our models to the $Λ$CDM model using ${{\protectχ}^2_{min}}$, ${{\protectχ}^2_{red}}$, $AIC$, $ΔAIC$, $BIC$ and $ΔBIC$. We also examine cosmological parameters such as deceleration and EoS parameters to determine the current acceleration expansion of the Universe. Furthermore, we test our model using $Om$ diagnostic and compare it to the $Λ$CDM model to determine its dark energy profile. Finally, we draw the conclusion that statistically speaking, both linear and nonlinear models show good compatibility with the $Λ$CDM model.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Gaurav N. Gadbail, Himanshu Chaudhary, Amine Bouali, P. K. Sahoo. 2024-10-31. Statistical and Observation Comparison of Weyl-Type $f(Q,T)$ Models with the $Λ$CDM Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116727
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.