Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2305.17562

Mixed-integer linear programming for computing optimal experimental designs

Abstract

The problem of computing an exact experimental design that is optimal for the least-squares estimation of the parameters of a regression model is considered. We show that this problem can be solved via mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) for a wide class of optimality criteria, including the criteria of A-, I-, G- and MV-optimality. This approach improves upon the current state-of-the-art mathematical programming formulation, which uses mixed-integer second-order cone programming. The key idea underlying the MILP formulation is McCormick relaxation, which critically depends on finite interval bounds for the elements of the covariance matrix of the least-squares estimator corresponding to an optimal exact design. We provide both analytic and algorithmic methods for constructing these bounds. We also demonstrate the unique advantages of the MILP approach, such as the possibility of incorporating multiple design constraints into the optimization problem, including constraints on the variances and covariances of the least-squares estimator.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Radoslav Harman, Samuel Rosa. 2024-06-16. Mixed-integer linear programming for computing optimal experimental designs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2024.106200

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Wasserstein mixing of a systematic-scan random rotation sampler

We study the mixing time of a systematic-scan analogue of Kac's walk that was proposed as a fast surrogate for Haar-distributed orthogonal matrices in randomized high-dimensional algorithms and was conjectured to approach Haar measure after only logarithmically many sweeps. We show that this conjectured speed-up does not occur for convergence of the full matrix law to Haar measure in Frobenius Wasserstein distance. At fixed normalized accuracy, the mixing time lies between order $n/\log n$ and order $n$ sweeps; at fixed absolute Frobenius accuracy, the corresponding bounds are between order $n$ and order $n\log n$. More strongly, below the scale $n/\log n$, the normalized Wasserstein distance remains asymptotically at its extremal value. We also show that the output law is singular with respect to Haar measure for fewer than $n/2$ sweeps. Thus the sampler may provide effective application-specific randomization without exhibiting the much faster full-Haar mixing.

stat.CO

Bayesian Calibration with Functional Outputs Using Elastic Partial Matching

Calibrating a simulation model involves estimating its parameters by comparing model outputs with experimental data, so that simulation results faithfully reproduce the experimental observations. When the outputs are functions of time, there are multiple ways to quantify the discrepancy between experimental and simulated curves. A recent approach based on elastic functional data analysis decomposes a functional output into two components: a function temporally aligned to a template, and the corresponding warping function. This decomposition splits the problem into two independent calibration tasks, thereby addressing functional misalignment. However, it assumes that experimental and simulated curves share the same temporal support, an assumption often violated in practice when initial or end times are themselves uncertain or depend on the calibration parameters. In this work, we reinterpret the decomposition step as an approximation to a more general Bayesian calibration problem that incorporates an error term on the time axis. This perspective allows us to naturally extend the framework to a broader family of time warpings with varying initial or end times, using partial elastic alignment. We illustrate the method on a synthetic test case, comparing it with existing Bayesian calibration methods and demonstrating improved surrogate performance and error modeling. We then apply the proposed approach to the calibration of an equation of state (a thermodynamic equation relating the state variables of a material).

stat.CO

Some surprising properties of essential data points visualization

Essential Data Points (EDPs) - the vertices of the convex hull of a bilinear data matrix $\mathbf{D}$ in its row space, column space, or both - are widely used in chemometrics to reduce the size of large data sets while nominally preserving their underlying geometric structure. Using simulated three- and two-component chromatographic/spectral data sets and a real source-apportionment data set ($\mathbf{D = C\, A^\mathsf{T}}$), together with Borgen-Rajkó plots, Procrustes analysis, and variance-covariance comparisons, we show that this preservation is only \emph{partial}: row-wise EDP reduction preserves the row-space geometry (inner and outer polygons) exactly while distorting the column-space geometry, and column-wise reduction shows the opposite behavior; joint row-and-column reduction distorts both. We then give a rigorous, general proof - based on the four fundamental subspaces of a matrix and its singular value decomposition $\mathbf{D = U\,S\,V^\mathsf{T}}$ - that the subspace which is \emph{not} being reduced is always preserved exactly, up to an orthogonal rotation, whereas the subspace whose ambient dimension shrinks is related to the original only through a general, non-orthogonal isomorphism. This distinction is confirmed numerically to machine precision ($\sim 10^{-14}$-$10^{-16}$) on the real data set, and a deliberate negative control confirms that the "ambient-shrinking" map is genuinely non-orthogonal (residual $\approx 1$). These results demonstrate that the apparent rotation of an EDP-reduced polygon relative to the original is not, in general, a rigid rotation, and that visual or numerical comparisons between an EDP-reduced data set and the original data require an explicit, mode-dependent change-of-basis correction before any geometric or statistical conclusion can be drawn. A MATLAB implementation of this correction is provided.

stat.CO