Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.01699

Logarithmically enhanced area-laws for fermions in vanishing magnetic fields in dimension two

Paul Pfeiffer·Wolfgang Spitzer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider fermionic ground states of the Landau Hamiltonian, $H_B$, in a constant magnetic field of strength $B>0$ in $\mathbb R^2$ at some fixed Fermi energy $\mu>0$, described by the Fermi projection $P_B:= 1(H_B\le \mu)$. For some fixed bounded domain $\Lambda\subset \mathbb{R}^2$ with boundary set $\partial\Lambda$ and an $L>0$ we restrict these ground states spatially to the scaled domain $L \Lambda$ and denote the corresponding localised Fermi projection by $P_B(L\Lambda)$. Then we study the scaling of the Hilbert-space trace, $\mathrm{tr} f(P_B(L\Lambda))$, for polynomials $f$ with $f(0)=f(1)=0$ of these localised ground states in the joint limit $L\to\infty$ and $B\to0$. We obtain to leading order logarithmically enhanced area-laws depending on the size of $LB$. Roughly speaking, if $1/B$ tends to infinity faster than $L$, then we obtain the known enhanced area-law (by the Widom--Sobolev formula) of the form $L \ln(L) a(f,\mu) |\partial\Lambda|$ as $L\to\infty$ for the (two-dimensional) Laplacian with Fermi projection $1(H_0\le \mu)$. On the other hand, if $L$ tends to infinity faster than $1/B$, then we get an area law with an $L \ln(\mu/B) a(f,\mu) |\partial\Lambda|$ asymptotic expansion as $B\to0$. The numerical coefficient $a(f,\mu)$ in both cases is the same and depends solely on the function $f$ and on $\mu$. The asymptotic result in the latter case is based upon the recent joint work of Leschke, Sobolev and the second named author for fixed $B$, a proof of the sine-kernel asymptotics on a global scale, and on the enhanced area-law in dimension one by Landau and Widom. In the special but important case of a quadratic function $f$ we are able to cover the full range of parameters $B$ and $L$. In general, we have a smaller region of parameters $(B,L)$ where we can prove the two-scale asymptotic expansion $\mathrm{tr} f(P_B(L\Lambda))$ as $L\to\infty$ and $B\to0$.

Explore related subjects

math-phcond-mat.stat-mechmath.FAmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paul Pfeiffer, Wolfgang Spitzer. 2023-07-04. Logarithmically enhanced area-laws for fermions in vanishing magnetic fields in dimension two. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗