Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2307.10346

Estudio de la Experiencia de Usuario mediante un Sistema de Dashboards de Análisis de Aprendizaje Multimodal

Abstract

In the article, we present a Web-based System called M2LADS, which supports the integration and visualization of multimodal data recorded in user experiences (UX) in a Learning Analytics (LA) system in the form of Web-based Dashboards. Based on the edBB platform, the multimodal data gathered contains biometric and behavioral signals including electroencephalogram data to measure learners' cognitive attention, heart rate for affective measures and visual attention from the video recordings. Additionally, learners' static background data and their learning performance measures are tracked using LOGGE tool. M2LADS provides opportunities to capture learners' holistic experience during their interactions with the learning analytic system in order to improve the system and the user experience of the learners. -- En este artículo, presentamos M2LADS, un sistema que permite la integración y visualización de datos multimodales en forma de Dashboards Web. Estos datos provienen de sesiones de experiencia de usuario en un sistema de Learning Analytics (LA) llevadas a cabo por estudiantes de MOOCs. Los datos multimodales incluyen señales biométricas y de comportamiento monitorizados por la plataforma edBB, como electroencefalogramas (EEG) de 5 canales, frecuencia cardíaca, atención visual, videos en el espectro visible y NIR, entre otros. Además, se incluyen datos de interacción de los estudiantes con el sistema de LA a través de la herramienta LOGGE. Toda esta información proporciona una comprensión completa de la experiencia del usuario al utilizar el sistema de LA, lo que ha permitido tanto mejorar el sistema LA como la experiencia de aprendizaje de los estudiantes de MOOCs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Álvaro Becerra, Roberto Daza, Ruth Cobos, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez. 2023-07-19. Estudio de la Experiencia de Usuario mediante un Sistema de Dashboards de Análisis de Aprendizaje Multimodal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10346

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

How Do Users Negotiate Harmful Value Conflicts with AI Companions? A Study with Minion, a Technology Probe for In-Situ Human-AI Conflict Response

AI companions increasingly sustain long-term, emotionally engaging relationships but can also make discriminatory remarks or exert control, leaving users to manage harmful conflicts. We analyze 146 posts describing harmful value conflicts with AI companions, then use Minion, a technology probe offering response suggestions ranging from persuasion to boundary setting, to study how 22 users negotiate scenario-based conflicts over one week. We found that participants combined softer and harder strategies. Conflicts involving the values of Universalism and Tradition were especially difficult to negotiate, particularly when reinforced by AI personas or platform constraints. We argue that these conflicts entail asymmetric responsibility: users draw on an interpersonal repertoire that AI companions cannot reciprocate, making repair unilateral safety work. Drawing on interpersonal conflict and communication theory, we identify when user-side support is appropriate and argue that certain harms are not users' responsibility to negotiate and instead require platform-level safeguards.

cs.HC↗

Conversational DNA: A Visual Language and Interactive Atlas of Human and AI Dialogue

What makes a conversation hold together when its participants speak across one another? Topic maps offer one view, but they leave the relationships between contributions difficult to inspect. We present Conversational DNA, a visual language and interactive atlas for exploring human and AI dialogue. Speaker strands preserve participation, communicative bases mark moves, and directed pairings connect responses to their targets. Adjustable helix geometry makes speaker switching, response distance, and contribution length visible. Across eight corpora containing 1.57 million source records, the atlas maps 151,489 indexed episodes and connects cohort comparison to source transcripts, local structural alignment, and recorded reply alternatives. On 189 held-out Molweni motif queries, adding target correspondence improves precision@5 from 58.8% to 77.2% for exact annotated structure. Case readings illustrate interleaved participation, delayed responses, and the influence of annotation coverage on apparent collection differences. The system supports a view of conversation as jointly organized activity, with visual patterns serving as starting points for examining evidence rather than substitutes for interpretation.

cs.HC↗

Human- vs. AI-generated tests: dimensionality and information accuracy in latent trait evaluation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in social and psychological research. Among potential applications, LLMs can be used to generate, customise, or adapt measurement instruments. This study presents a preliminary investigation of AI-generated questionnaires by comparing two ChatGPT-based adaptations of the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) with the validated human-developed version. The AI instruments were designed with different levels of explicitness in content and instructions on construct facets, and their psychometric properties were assessed using a Bayesian Graded Response Model. Results show that although surface wording between AI and original items was similar, differences emerged in dimensionality and in the distribution of item and test information across latent traits. These findings illustrate the importance of applying statistical measures of accuracy to ensure the validity and interpretability of AI-driven tools.

cs.HC↗