Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2308.03151

Food-500 Cap: A Fine-Grained Food Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language Models

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown impressive performance in substantial downstream multi-modal tasks. However, only comparing the fine-tuned performance on downstream tasks leads to the poor interpretability of VLMs, which is adverse to their future improvement. Several prior works have identified this issue and used various probing methods under a zero-shot setting to detect VLMs' limitations, but they all examine VLMs using general datasets instead of specialized ones. In practical applications, VLMs are usually applied to specific scenarios, such as e-commerce and news fields, so the generalization of VLMs in specific domains should be given more attention. In this paper, we comprehensively investigate the capabilities of popular VLMs in a specific field, the food domain. To this end, we build a food caption dataset, Food-500 Cap, which contains 24,700 food images with 494 categories. Each image is accompanied by a detailed caption, including fine-grained attributes of food, such as the ingredient, shape, and color. We also provide a culinary culture taxonomy that classifies each food category based on its geographic origin in order to better analyze the performance differences of VLM in different regions. Experiments on our proposed datasets demonstrate that popular VLMs underperform in the food domain compared with their performance in the general domain. Furthermore, our research reveals severe bias in VLMs' ability to handle food items from different geographic regions. We adopt diverse probing methods and evaluate nine VLMs belonging to different architectures to verify the aforementioned observations. We hope that our study will bring researchers' attention to VLM's limitations when applying them to the domain of food or culinary cultures, and spur further investigations to address this issue.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zheng Ma, Mianzhi Pan, Wenhan Wu, Kanzhi Cheng, Jianbing Zhang, Shujian Huang, Jiajun Chen. 2023-08-06. Food-500 Cap: A Fine-Grained Food Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03151

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV