Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.03678

Evaluation of ARM CPUs for IceCube available through Google Kubernetes Engine

Igor Sfiligoi·David Schultz·Benedikt Riedel·Frank Würthwein
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The IceCube experiment has substantial simulation needs and is in continuous search for the most cost-effective ways to satisfy them. The most CPU-intensive part relies on CORSIKA, a cosmic ray air shower simulation. Historically, IceCube relied exclusively on x86-based CPUs, like Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC, but recently server-class ARM-based CPUs are also becoming available, both on-prem and in the cloud. In this paper we present our experience in running a sample CORSIKA simulation on both ARM and x86 CPUs available through Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). We used the production binaries for the x86 instances, but had to build the binaries for ARM instances from source code, which turned out to be mostly painless. Our benchmarks show that ARM-based CPUs in GKE were not only the most cost-effective but were also the fastest in absolute terms in all the tested configurations. While the advantage is not drastic, about 20% in cost-effectiveness and less than 10% in absolute terms, it is still large enough to warrant an investment in ARM support for IceCube.

Explore related subjects

cs.PFastro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Igor Sfiligoi, David Schultz, Benedikt Riedel, Frank Würthwein. 2023-08-07. Evaluation of ARM CPUs for IceCube available through Google Kubernetes Engine. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03678

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Performance Analysis of Low-Order, GPU-accelerated Finite Element Kernels using Kokkos

We study performance portability for low-order, matrix-free finite element kernels, using the example of a vectorial, variable-coefficient PDE operator originating in geophysical models. Written in Kokkos, the kernel is compared on NVIDIA H100, AMD MI250X, AMD MI300A and Intel PVC Max 1550 GPUs. Owing to its low order and to optimizations that reduce the arithmetic, the kernel has a low arithmetic intensity, so that its performance is determined by how the finite element assembly is mapped onto the memory hierarchy. This is a dimension in which the architectures differ even within one vendor family, causing different performance characteristics. We examine how Kokkos' hierarchical parallelism and shared scratch memory, which are used for the shared degrees of freedom of the conforming discretization, behave on each device. Finally, we show how portability gaps can be narrowed with tuning levers such as the size of the thread groups, the balance between occupancy and register use, and the atomic accumulation strategy at the end of the kernel.

cs.PF↗
arXiv2026

Measured Joules, Learned Routes: Learning to Route for Energy-Efficient LLM Serving

Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems are creating rapidly growing inference energy demands as model sizes grow and reasoning trajectories extend. While in practice, many queries do not require the capabilities of the largest available model, and routinely directing such queries to a high-capability model can introduce unnecessary, considerable computation and energy consumption. In this paper, we investigate whether adaptive routing across a heterogeneous pool of LLMs can reduce this energy burden without substantially compromising task performance. We design a language-model-based router that reads in each query and selects an answer model from a fixed candidate pool. The candidate models are first profiled through an offline tournament that records their correctness, latency, power, and GPU energy for each query. Using these measurements, the router is trained through supervised fine-tuning followed by group relative policy optimization (GRPO) with the tailored paradigms. Results demonstrate that learned routing can selectively allocate expensive model capacity based on query context and improve the accuracy-energy tradeoff in multi-LLM serving. Across seven benchmark tasks, we also observe a sharp accuracy-energy phase transition among routers, providing practical insights into improving energy efficiency while maintaining LLM performance.

cs.PF↗
arXiv2026

PrefixBench-H100: Characterizing Prefix Reuse and Time-to-First-Token in H100 LLM Serving

Repeated prompt prefixes are increasingly common in LLM serving workloads, appearing in system prompts, templated retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, agent frameworks, and multi-turn conversations. Modern inference runtimes such as vLLM and TensorRT-LLM provide mechanisms for reusing previously computed KV-cache state across requests, yet it remains unclear when prefix reuse materially improves serving performance on contemporary accelerators and when its benefits are limited by scheduling, cache granularity, concurrency, or memory pressure. This paper presents PrefixBench-H100, a reproducible benchmark and measurement framework for characterizing prefix reuse on a single NVIDIA H100. PrefixBench-H100 combines controlled synthetic traces with chat-style and retrieval-style workloads, and evaluates two widely used LLM serving runtimes under matched workload conditions. The benchmark varies shared-prefix length, suffix diversity, request arrival pattern, concurrency, output length, and cache configuration, while collecting time-to-first-token, inter-token latency, end-to-end latency, throughput, cache-hit statistics, GPU memory usage, and selected profiling traces. The goal of PrefixBench-H100 is not to introduce a new caching algorithm, but to expose the practical operating envelope of prefix reuse for H100-class LLM serving. The study identifies the regime where prefix reuse provides substantial first-token latency reductions and the regime where cache pressure erodes them, while showing that cache effectiveness itself is largely insensitive to concurrency and output length; the cross-runtime differences that remain arise above the cache, in the scheduling layer.

cs.PF↗