Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2309.06601

Monografía de Estadística Bayesiana

Arturo Erdely·Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Course notes about an introduction to Bayesian Statistics. First, an explanation of the bayesian paradigm is motivated and explained in detail (first three chapters). Then, a brief introduction to the basics about Decision Theory in chapter four, which is self contained, with the purpose of introducing parametrica bayesian inference as a decision problem in chapter five.

Explore related subjects

stat.OT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arturo Erdely, Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña. 2023-09-12. Monografía de Estadística Bayesiana. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06601

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio of the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests subject to a paired design

The weighted kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test is a measure of the beyond-chance agreement between the diagnostic test and the gold standard, and depends on the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test, on the disease prevalence and on the relative importance between the false positives and the false negatives. This article studies the comparison of the weighted kappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design through confidence intervals. Three asymptotic confidence intervals are studied for the difference between the parameters and five other intervals for the ratio. Simulation experiments were carried out to study the coverage probabilities and the average lengths of the intervals, giving some general rules for application. A method is also proposed to calculate the sample size necessary to compare the two weighted kappa coefficients through a confidence interval. A program in R has been written to solve the problem studied and it is available as supplementary material. The results were applied to a real example of the diagnosis of malaria.

stat.OT↗
arXiv2026

Engaging students with statistics through choice of real data context on homework

Statistics educators recommend teaching with real data with relevant contexts, but defining relevancy is challenging and varies by student. We investigated whether providing student choice of data context increases engagement through a quasi-experiment in two sections of an introductory probability and statistics course at a large public university (n=65 consenting students). Sections alternated as treatment and control: during their treatment, students chose weekly homework from three similar instructor-provided options varying by data context; during control weeks, they received randomly assigned contexts. We found no significant difference in homework grades between treatment and control conditions. However, thematic analysis revealed students with choice reported enhanced engagement and motivation, greater appreciation for statistics' real-world value, and increased autonomy. Students overwhelmingly preferred contexts relevant to their interests, experiences, daily lives, and career paths-though preferences varied considerably across individuals. Based on these findings, we provide four recommendations for statistics educators: (1) use real data with authentic contexts, (2) select contexts students care about, (3) incorporate variety across data contexts, and (4) consider choice as a pedagogical tool.

stat.OT↗
arXiv2026

See You at the Posterior Line: Learning Bayesian Modeling Through a Car Racing Game

We present an interactive classroom activity designed to address a central challenge in teaching introductory Bayesian statistics: how to formalize subjective knowledge and available information into prior distributions and then update them with empirical data. Role-playing as data analysts for a racing team, students evaluate candidate tires by converting qualitative engineering reports into prior distributions, collecting primary data via a virtual racing game, and using a Beta-Binomial model to inform team strategy. This discovery-based exercise allows small groups to observe directly how different prior choices and sample data jointly shape posterior inference. Student feedback ($n=32$) highlights high enjoyment, engagement and improved conceptual clarity. Open-access materials to implement the activity are provided, alongside recommendations for adapting it to other teaching contexts.

stat.OT↗