Which Parameterization of the Matérn Covariance Function?

Kesen Wang; Sameh Abdulah; Ying Sun; Marc G. Genton

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2309.12000

Which Parameterization of the Matérn Covariance Function?

Kesen Wang·Sameh Abdulah·Ying Sun·Marc G. Genton

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Matérn family of covariance functions is currently the most popularly used model in spatial statistics, geostatistics, and machine learning to specify the correlation between two geographical locations based on spatial distance. Compared to existing covariance functions, the Matérn family has more flexibility in data fitting because it allows the control of the field smoothness through a dedicated parameter. Moreover, it generalizes other popular covariance functions. However, fitting the smoothness parameter is computationally challenging since it complicates the optimization process. As a result, some practitioners set the smoothness parameter at an arbitrary value to reduce the optimization convergence time. In the literature, studies have used various parameterizations of the Matérn covariance function, assuming they are equivalent. This work aims at studying the effectiveness of different parameterizations under various settings. We demonstrate the feasibility of inferring all parameters simultaneously and quantifying their uncertainties on large-scale data using the ExaGeoStat parallel software. We also highlight the importance of the smoothness parameter by analyzing the Fisher information of the statistical parameters. We show that the various parameterizations have different properties and differ from several perspectives. In particular, we study the three most popular parameterizations in terms of parameter estimation accuracy, modeling accuracy and efficiency, prediction efficiency, uncertainty quantification, and asymptotic properties. We further demonstrate their differing performances under nugget effects and approximated covariance. Lastly, we give recommendations for parameterization selection based on our experimental results.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME stat.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kesen Wang, Sameh Abdulah, Ying Sun, Marc G. Genton. 2023-08-28. Which Parameterization of the Matérn Covariance Function?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12000

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗