Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2309.12985

Fractal Word Search: How Deep to Delve

Abstract

We look at the puzzle \textit{In the Details} which appeared in the 2013 MIT Mystery Hunt and which gained fame as the \textit{fractal word search}. This seemingly impossible puzzle, whose solution could not fit the memory of a modern computer if the puzzle were solved using a brute-force approach, requires an understanding of its fundamental structure to be cracked. In this paper, we study fractal word searches in a general setting, where we consider one- and two-dimensional word searches with alphabets of any length and replacement rules of any size. We prove that the puzzle is solvable within a finite number of steps under this generalization and give an explicit upper bound on the latest level on which a word of a given length can appear for the first time in a given direction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Klára Churá, Tanya Khovanova. 2023-09-22. Fractal Word Search: How Deep to Delve. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12985

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO