Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2309.16852

Spreading in graphs

Abstract

Several concepts that model processes of spreading (of information, disease, objects, etc.) in graphs or networks have been studied. In many contexts, we assume that some vertices of a graph $G$ are contaminated initially, before the process starts. By the $q$-forcing rule, a contaminated vertex having at most $q$ uncontaminated neighbors enforces all the neighbors to become contaminated, while by the $p$-percolation rule, an uncontaminated vertex becomes contaminated if at least $p$ of its neighbors are contaminated. In this paper, we consider sets $S$ that are at the same time $q$-forcing sets and $p$-percolating sets, and call them $(p,q)$-spreading sets. Given positive integers $p$ and $q$, the minimum cardinality of a $(p,q)$-spreading set in $G$ is a $(p,q)$-spreading number, $σ_{(p,q)}(G)$, of $G$. While $q$-forcing sets have been studied in a dozen of papers, the decision version of the corresponding graph invariant has not been considered earlier, and we fill the gap by proving its NP-completeness. This, in turn, enables us to prove the NP-completeness of the decision version of the $(p,q)$-spreading number in graphs for an arbitrary choice of $p$ and $q$. Again, for every $p\in \mathbb{N}$ and $q\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}$, we find a linear-time algorithm for determining the $(p,q)$-spreading number of a tree. In addition, we present a lower and an upper bound on the $(p,q)$-spreading number of a tree and characterize extremal families of trees. In the case of square grids, we combine some known results and new results on $(2,1)$-spreading and $(4,q)$-spreading to obtain $σ_{(p,q)}(P_m\Box P_n)$ for all $(p,q)\in (\mathbb{N}\setminus\{3\})\times (\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\})$ and all $m,n\in\mathbb{N}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boštjan Brešar, Tanja Dravec, Aysel Erey, Jaka Hedžet. 2023-10-02. Spreading in graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16852

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO