Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2310.01748

A generative approach to frame-level multi-competitor races

Tyrel Stokes·Gurashish Bagga·Kimberly Kroetch·Brendan Kumagai·Liam Welsh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multi-competitor races often feature complicated within-race strategies that are difficult to capture when training data on race outcome level data. Further, models which do not account for such strategic effects may suffer from confounded inferences and predictions. In this work we develop a general generative model for multi-competitor races which allows analysts to explicitly model certain strategic effects such as changing lanes or drafting and separate these impacts from competitor ability. The generative model allows one to simulate full races from any real or created starting position which opens new avenues for attributing value to within-race actions and to perform counter-factual analyses. This methodology is sufficiently general to apply to any track based multi-competitor races where both tracking data is available and competitor movement is well described by simultaneous forward and lateral movements. We apply this methodology to one-mile horse races using data provided by the New York Racing Association (NYRA) and the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association (NYTHA) for the Big Data Derby 2022 Kaggle Competition. This data features granular tracking data for all horses at the frame-level (occurring at approximately 4hz). We demonstrate how this model can yield new inferences, such as the estimation of horse-specific speed profiles which vary over phases of the race, and examples of posterior predictive counterfactual simulations to answer questions of interest such as starting lane impacts on race outcomes.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tyrel Stokes, Gurashish Bagga, Kimberly Kroetch, Brendan Kumagai, Liam Welsh. 2024-03-06. A generative approach to frame-level multi-competitor races. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01748

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗