Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2310.06153

Multi-Robot Task Assignment and Path Finding for Time-Sensitive Missions with Online Task Generation

David Thorne·Brett T. Lopez
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Executing time-sensitive multi-robot missions involves two distinct problems: Multi-Robot Task Assignment (MRTA) and Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF). Computing safe paths that complete every task and minimize the time to mission completion, or makespan, is a significant computational challenge even for small teams. In many missions, tasks can be generated during execution which is typically handled by either recomputing task assignments and paths from scratch, or by modifying existing plans using approximate approaches. While performing task reassignment and path finding from scratch produces theoretically optimal results, the computational load makes it too expensive for online implementation. In this work, we present Time-Sensitive Online Task Assignment and Navigation (TSOTAN), a framework which can quickly incorporate online generated tasks while guaranteeing bounded suboptimal task assignment makespans. It does this by assessing the quality of partial task reassignments and only performing a complete reoptimization when the makespan exceeds a user specified suboptimality bound. Through experiments in 2D environments we demonstrate TSOTAN's ability to produce quality solutions with computation times suitable for online implementation.

Explore related subjects

cs.MAcs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Thorne, Brett T. Lopez. 2023-10-09. Multi-Robot Task Assignment and Path Finding for Time-Sensitive Missions with Online Task Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MAS-Shield: A Defense Framework for Secure and Efficient LLM MAS

Large Language Model (LLM)-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are susceptible to linguistic attacks that can trigger cascading failures across the network. Existing defenses face a fundamental dilemma: lightweight single-auditor methods are prone to single points of failure, while robust committee-based approaches incur prohibitive computational costs in multi-turn interactions. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{MAS-Shield}, a secure and efficient defense framework designed with a coarse-to-fine filtering pipeline. Rather than applying uniform scrutiny, MAS-Shield dynamically allocates defense resources through a three-stage protocol: (1) \textbf{Critical Agent Selection } strategically targets high-influence nodes to narrow the defense surface; (2) \textbf{Light Auditing} employs lightweight sentry models to rapidly filter the majority of benign cases; and (3) \textbf{Global Consensus Auditing} escalates only suspicious or ambiguous signals to a heavyweight committee for definitive arbitration. This hierarchical design effectively optimizes the security-efficiency trade-off. Experiments demonstrate that MAS-Shield achieves a 92.5\% recovery rate against diverse adversarial scenarios and reduces defense latency by over 70\% compared to existing methods.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

DM$^3$-Nav: Decentralized Multi-Agent Multimodal Multi-Object Semantic Navigation

We present DM$^3$-Nav, a fully decentralized multi-agent semantic navigation system supporting multimodal open-vocabulary goal specification and multi-object missions. In our setting, decentralization implies operation without a central coordinator, global map aggregation, or shared global state at runtime. Robots operate autonomously and coordinate through ad-hoc pairwise communication, exchanging local maps, goal status, and navigation intent without synchronization. An implicit task allocation mechanism combining intent broadcasting and distance-weighted frontier selection reduces redundant exploration while preserving decentralized operation. Evaluations on HM3DSem scenes using the HM3Dv0.2 and GOAT-Bench datasets demonstrate that DM$^3$-Nav matches or exceeds centralized and shared-map baselines while eliminating single points of failure inherent in centralized architectures. Finally, we validate our approach in a real-world office environment using two mobile robots, demonstrating successful deployment relying entirely on onboard sensing and computation. A video of our real-world experiments is available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiUSCn5rIvtuTUqtuXLPgmt6S8x9-MCZ/view?usp=drive_link

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on verifier and critic agents to suppress hallucinations, but verification is delayed. During this delay, false claims can propagate through the agent network. We model this process as delayed consensus on a graph with grounded corrector nodes. Spectral decomposition by the grounded Laplacian yields a closed-form stability threshold for the verification dose: correction that is too strong or too delayed can turn consensus into oscillation. The most unstable regime occurs when the communication and verification delays coincide; for delay two, the threshold is the inverse golden ratio. The same framework gives a supermodular placement objective and a greedy (1-1/e)-approximation rule for assigning a limited corrector budget to influential nodes. Experiments across five open models confirm the predicted dose-delay oscillations. By contrast, grounded factual answering makes truth an absorbing boundary and eliminates the effect, suggesting that the instability is specific to signed-belief tasks while grounded verification remains stabilizing

cs.MA↗