Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2310.11281

Self-supervision meets kernel graph neural models: From architecture to augmentations

Abstract

Graph representation learning has now become the de facto standard when handling graph-structured data, with the framework of message-passing graph neural networks (MPNN) being the most prevailing algorithmic tool. Despite its popularity, the family of MPNNs suffers from several drawbacks such as transparency and expressivity. Recently, the idea of designing neural models on graphs using the theory of graph kernels has emerged as a more transparent as well as sometimes more expressive alternative to MPNNs known as kernel graph neural networks (KGNNs). Developments on KGNNs are currently a nascent field of research, leaving several challenges from algorithmic design and adaptation to other learning paradigms such as self-supervised learning. In this paper, we improve the design and learning of KGNNs. Firstly, we extend the algorithmic formulation of KGNNs by allowing a more flexible graph-level similarity definition that encompasses former proposals like random walk graph kernel, as well as providing a smoother optimization objective that alleviates the need of introducing combinatorial learning procedures. Secondly, we enhance KGNNs through the lens of self-supervision via developing a novel structure-preserving graph data augmentation method called latent graph augmentation (LGA). Finally, we perform extensive empirical evaluations to demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed mechanisms. Experimental results over benchmark datasets suggest that our proposed model achieves competitive performance that is comparable to or sometimes outperforming state-of-the-art graph representation learning frameworks with or without self-supervision on graph classification tasks. Comparisons against other previously established graph data augmentation methods verify that the proposed LGA augmentation scheme captures better semantics of graph-level invariance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiawang Dan, Ruofan Wu, Yunpeng Liu, Baokun Wang, Changhua Meng, Tengfei Liu, Tianyi Zhang, Ningtao Wang, Xing Fu, Qi Li, Weiqiang Wang. 2023-10-17. Self-supervision meets kernel graph neural models: From architecture to augmentations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Label Propagation for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Physics-Informed Gaussian Processes

We present a series of empirical results of the application of semi-supervised label propagation techniques in training physics-informed machine learning methods. This includes self-training of physics-informed neural networks and physics-informed Gaussian processes in isolation, and the integration of the two via co-training, therefore establishing a hybrid between these two main classes of physics-informed machine learning. We demonstrate via extensive numerical experiments how these methods can ameliorate the issue of propagating information from boundaries into the physical domain, including information from initial conditions in the case of solving stiff time-dependent partial differential equations, which is known to be a common failure mode of physics-informed machine learning.

cs.LG

Multi-Armed Bernoulli Bandits via Minimax Single-Arm Stopping

We develop an index policy for finite-horizon Bernoulli multi-armed bandits from minimax solutions to single-arm bandit (SAB) problems. Each SAB problem involves choosing between an unknown Bernoulli arm and a known reward. We show that minimizing worst-case regret of SAB problems over all non-anticipative policies admits an exact semi-infinite linear programming formulation. The resulting stopping policies offer a natural way to compare arms: the higher the known reward against which a policy continues sampling, the more promising the unknown arm. We turn this intuition into indices based on cumulative continuation probabilities, with a monotone adjustment and a reward-shortfall cap. By relating index errors to the regret of single-arm stopping policies, we establish a distribution-free regret bound of $4.45\sqrt{KT}+10.75K$ for $K$ arms and horizon $T$. This bound matches the minimax-optimal regret order established in the literature. The guarantee extends to rewards supported on $[0,1]$ through Bernoulli randomization. We also provide a finite-grid implementation with quantified approximation loss. In numerical experiments, the SAB-based index policy achieves lower worst-case regret than every tested benchmark policy across all evaluated numbers of arms and horizons, while closely matching the grid-based MAB minimax policy in the two-arm setting.

cs.LG

Autonomous Model Lifecycle Management for Digital Twin-Based Manufacturing Control

Manufacturing AI systems must autonomously adapt to continuous distributional shift from raw-material variability, ambient changes, and equipment aging, under strict safeguard and operator-trust requirements where model failures risk physical damage. This paper presents a closed-loop Cyber-Physical System (CPS) for autonomous model lifecycle management in automotive manufacturing, deployed since 2023. The system manages product-specialized model pairs: a sequence-to-sequence physics model (LPP) serving as a digital twin, and a deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) control policy (LCP) trained against it. Per retraining cycle, multiple model variants spanning architecture families and RL algorithms compete; only the best-scoring candidate advances. A Conductor orchestrator autonomously manages plant-wide model inventories with dependency-aware retraining and Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) fallback. Reflecting the principle of Human-Centric Intelligence, the LCP composite score embeds an operator-trust gate penalizing policies deviating from established practice; without it, 23% of policies are rejected by operators despite passing accuracy thresholds. Across multiple facilities, LCP-controlled processes achieve process stability improvements of 28-45% over uncontrolled baselines with zero safety incidents.

cs.LG