Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2310.19477

VDIP-TGV: Blind Image Deconvolution via Variational Deep Image Prior Empowered by Total Generalized Variation

Abstract

Recovering clear images from blurry ones with an unknown blur kernel is a challenging problem. Deep image prior (DIP) proposes to use the deep network as a regularizer for a single image rather than as a supervised model, which achieves encouraging results in the nonblind deblurring problem. However, since the relationship between images and the network architectures is unclear, it is hard to find a suitable architecture to provide sufficient constraints on the estimated blur kernels and clean images. Also, DIP uses the sparse maximum a posteriori (MAP), which is insufficient to enforce the selection of the recovery image. Recently, variational deep image prior (VDIP) was proposed to impose constraints on both blur kernels and recovery images and take the standard deviation of the image into account during the optimization process by the variational principle. However, we empirically find that VDIP struggles with processing image details and tends to generate suboptimal results when the blur kernel is large. Therefore, we combine total generalized variational (TGV) regularization with VDIP in this paper to overcome these shortcomings of VDIP. TGV is a flexible regularization that utilizes the characteristics of partial derivatives of varying orders to regularize images at different scales, reducing oil painting artifacts while maintaining sharp edges. The proposed VDIP-TGV effectively recovers image edges and details by supplementing extra gradient information through TGV. Additionally, this model is solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), which effectively combines traditional algorithms and deep learning methods. Experiments show that our proposed VDIP-TGV surpasses various state-of-the-art models quantitatively and qualitatively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tingting Wu, Zhiyan Du, Zhi Li, Feng-Lei Fan, Tieyong Zeng. 2023-11-10. VDIP-TGV: Blind Image Deconvolution via Variational Deep Image Prior Empowered by Total Generalized Variation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19477

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV