Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2311.02388

A theoretical expansion of the Sprout game

Soura Sena Das·Zin Mar Myint·Soumen Nandi·Sagnik Sen·Éric Sopena
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sprout is a two-player pen and paper game which starts with $n$ vertices, and the players take turns to join two pre-existing dots by a subdivided edge while keeping the graph sub-cubic planar at all times. The first player not being able to move loses. A major conjecture claims that Player 1 has a winning strategy if and only if $n \equiv 3,4,5$ ($\bmod~6$). The conjecture is verified until $44$, and a few isolated values of $n$, usually with the help of a computer. However, to the best of our understanding, not too much progress could be made towards finding a theoretical proof of the conjecture till now. In this article, we try to take a bottom-up approach and start building a theory around the problem. We start by expanding a related game called Brussels Sprout (where dots are replaced by crosses) introduced by Conway, possibly to help the understanding of Sprout. In particular, we introduce and study a generalized version of Brussels Sprout where crosses are replaced by a dot having an arbitrary number of ``partial edges'' (say, general cross) coming out, and planar graphs are replaced by any (pre-decided) hereditary class of graphs. We study the game for forests, graphs on surfaces, and sparse planar graphs. We also do a nimber characterization of the game when the hereditary class is taken to be triangle-free planar graphs, and we have started the game with two arbitrary generalized crosses. Moreover, while studying this particular case, we naturally stumble upon a circular version of the same game and solve a difficult nimber characterization using the method of structural induction. The above mentioned proof may potentially be one approach to solving the Sprout conjecture.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Soura Sena Das, Zin Mar Myint, Soumen Nandi, Sagnik Sen, Éric Sopena. 2023-11-04. A theoretical expansion of the Sprout game. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗