Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2311.11231

Workforce pDEI: Productivity Coupled with DEI

Abstract

Ranking pertaining to the human-centered tasks -- underscoring their paramount significance in these domains such as evaluation and hiring process -- exhibits widespread prevalence across various industries. Consequently, decision-makers are taking proactive measurements to promote diversity, underscore equity, and advance inclusion. Their unwavering commitment to these ideals emanates from the following convictions: (i) Diversity encompasses a broad spectrum of differences; (ii) Equity involves the assurance of equitable opportunities; and (iii) Inclusion revolves around the cultivation of a sense of value and impartiality, concurrently empowering individuals. Data-driven AI tools have been used for screening and ranking processes. However, there is a growing concern that the presence of pre-existing biases in databases may be exacerbated, particularly in the context of imbalanced datasets or the black-box-schema. In this research, we propose a model-driven recruitment decision support tool that addresses fairness together with equity in the screening phase. We introduce the term ``pDEI" to represent the output-input oriented production efficiency adjusted by socioeconomic disparity. Taking into account various aspects of interpreting socioeconomic disparity, our goals are (i) maximizing the relative efficiency of underrepresented groups and (ii) understanding how socioeconomic disparity affects the cultivation of a DEI-positive workplace.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lanqing Du, Jinwook Lee. 2023-12-01. Workforce pDEI: Productivity Coupled with DEI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11231

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The time interpretation of expected utility theory

Economic models often maximise expectation values of wealth or utility. In non-ergodic settings, these can differ from time-averages, so that maximising expected outcomes need not maximise -- and can systematically reduce -- long-run wealth or utility. Ergodicity economics highlights this problem and models individual agents as maximising wealth in the long run, known as growth optimality. Two instances where expected utility maximisation maps to growth optimality are known: linear utility does this for additive wealth dynamics; and logarithmic utility for multiplicative wealth dynamics. Here we show that the mapping holds more generally when the utility function coincides with the ergodicity transformation in the growth optimal model. This mapping offers a theoretical basis for choosing utility functions and suggests the testable hypothesis that wealth dynamics are predictive of risk preferences.

econ.GN

Monetary Regimes and Trade before the Classical Gold Standard: Evidence from the Latin Monetary Union

This paper reexamines the trade effects of the Latin Monetary Union (LMU), a 19th century agreement to standardize gold and silver coinage among several European countries. The LMU provides a useful setting for studying whether monetary arrangements fostered trade before the classical gold standard, when gold, silver, bimetallic, and paper regimes coexisted. Because some countries already shared other monetary standards, treating all non-member pairs as a single control group mixes pairs with and without alternative forms of monetary coordination. I classify pairs by standard and estimate the LMU effect relative to pairs without a common standard, bringing the comparison closer to those used in the literature on the gold standard and contemporary currency unions. The results suggest that the LMU increased trade between its members by approximately 30\% during its early years, when bimetallism was still credible. These effects subsequently faded, converging to zero by the end of the 1870s. More broadly, these findings also highlight the importance of accounting for the existing monetary regimes when estimating the trade effects of other international policies.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN