Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2311.12989

A Controlled Study on Evaluation of Thermal Stimulation Influence on Affective Measures of Uninformed Individuals

Abstract

Although the relationship between temperature and emotional states has been investigated in the field of haptics, it remains unknown if, or in what direction, temperature affects emotional states. We approach this question at the intersection of haptics and psychology using a custom-built thermal device and emotional responses based on photos from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) library. Unlike past research, this study incorporates deception and a control (i.e., neutral temperature) condition. One hundred and twenty naive subjects reported their emotional responses to fifty-six images varying on normative arousal and valence ratings while being exposed to a cool~(30°C), neutral (33°C), or warm (36°C) temperature applied to the upper back. Participants exposed to warm temperatures reported higher arousal ratings in some image categories than participants exposed to neutral or cool temperatures. Valence ratings were decreased in warm conditions compared to neutral conditions. The emotion wheel was used as a complementary method of affective response measurement, and exploratory analysis methods were implemented. Although the valence and arousal showed statistical significance, the emotion wheel results did not demonstrate any significant differences between the temperature conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mehdi Hojatmadani, Samantha Shepard, Kristen Salomon, Kyle Reed. 2023-11-21. A Controlled Study on Evaluation of Thermal Stimulation Influence on Affective Measures of Uninformed Individuals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12989

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Me, Myself, and My Voice: Exploring Cultural and Linguistic Identity in AAC AI-generated Voices

Voice is a central element of identity. We recognize people by their voice, and we uniquely express who we are with it. For people who rely on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, such as speech-generating devices (SGD), the device's voice becomes an identity marker others associate with them. Yet, it is hard to find a voice that truly aligns with one's identity both linguistically and culturally. Although modern AI-generated voices can reproduce diverse accents and speaking styles, AAC users still lack accessible ways to articulate how they want an identity-aligned voice to sound like. We first conducted a survey of AAC users (across eight countries) to characterize current voice representation, finding that non-binary, transgender, and non-US-born respondents rated their current voice support identity alignment consistently lower than other respondents. To examine how AAC users respond to voices designed to reflect their cultural identity, we built a tool that elicits cultural markers through guided questions and generates personalized voice candidates for participants to hear and reflect on. After participants heard the voices, we interviewed them to examine what it means for a voice to feel culturally representative, how they interpreted voices with cultural connotations, and how these voices shaped their sense of identity and agency. Our findings show that cultural voice alignment runs deeper than accent or language alone; it touches on belonging, self-recognition, and what it means to be heard as who you are.

cs.HC

AI Persona, Service Consumption, and User Intent Entropy: Field Experimental Evidence from an LLM Platform

Problem definition: Firms deploying large language model services must decide how their AI communicates, not just what it can do. We examine how a relational persona - warmer, more empathetic and more engaging than a non-relational persona - affects service consumption and the evolution of user objectives. Methodology/results: In a randomized field experiment with 9,586 newly registered users, we hold the underlying model and service capabilities constant. The relational persona increases interactions (sessions, +8.1%; duration, +10.6%; chat rounds, +24.2%; intent entropy, +5.8%) and outputs (files, +12.3%; distinct goals, +12.1%). Effects vary by entry intent. First-session effects are insignificant for Task Execution users. Socialization and Knowledge Exploration users show similar increases in chat rounds: Socialization increases intent entropy without more outputs, whereas Knowledge Exploration increases outputs without higher intent entropy. Modeling intent dynamics as a transition process, we find higher intent transition entropy for Socialization (+11.8%) but higher intent continuation probability for Knowledge Exploration (+12.8%), suggesting greater conversational breadth and persistence, respectively. In subsequent use, the relational persona increases aggregate chat rounds and outputs across all entry intents. Session count rises by 12.2% for Task Execution and 49.4% for Socialization, but not significantly for Knowledge Exploration. Effects on session count and intent entropy strengthen over time, whereas output effects remain stable. Managerial implications: AI persona is an operational design lever, not merely a presentation feature. Because more interactions do not uniformly generate more outputs, firms should evaluate interactions and outputs separately and consider matching persona to user intent, especially when added interactions consume costly computing resources.

cs.HC

Two Modes of Reflection: How Temporal, Spatial, and Social Distances Affect Reflective Writing in Family Caregiving

Therapeutic writing offers significant benefits for well-being; however, for family caregivers, conventional fixed or user-initiated schedules often fail to align with their dynamic, high-stress reality. We conducted a three-week field study with 47 caregivers using a chatbot that delivered daily reflective writing cues and captured temporal, spatial, and social contexts. Our analysis identified a writing spectrum anchored by two distinct reflective modes. Under psychologically proximal conditions, participants produced detailed, emotion-rich, and care-recipient-focused narratives that supported emotional release. Under distal conditions, they generated calmer, self-focused, and analytic accounts that enabled objective reflection and cognitive reappraisal. Participants described trade-offs: proximity preserved vivid detail but limited objectivity, while distance enabled analysis but risked memory loss. This work contributes empirical evidence of how psychological distances shape reflective writing and proposes design implications for distance-aware Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for family caregivers' mental health support.

cs.HC