Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2311.13055

All $3$-transitive groups satisfy the strict-EKR property

Abstract

A subset $S$ of a transitive permutation group $G \leq \mathrm{Sym}(n)$ is said to be an intersecting set if, for every $g_{1},g_{2}\in S$, there is an $i \in [n]$ such that $g_{1}(i)=g_{2}(i)$. The stabilizer of a point in $[n]$ and its cosets are intersecting sets of size $|G|/n$. Such families are referred to as canonical intersecting sets. A result by Meagher, Spiga, and Tiep states that if $G$ is a $2$-transitive group, then $|G|/n$ is the size of an intersecting set of maximum size in $G$. In some $2$-transitive groups (for instance $\mathrm{Sym}(n)$, $\mathrm{Alt}(n)$), every intersecting set of maximum possible size is canonical. A permutation group, in which every intersecting family of maximum possible size is canonical, is said to satisfy the strict-EKR property. In this article, we investigate the structure of intersecting sets in $3$-transitive groups. A conjecture by Meagher and Spiga states that all $3$-transitive groups satisfy the strict-EKR property. Meagher and Spiga showed that this is true for the $3$-transitive group $\mathrm{PGL}(2,q)$. Using the classification of $3$-transitive groups and some results in literature, the conjecture reduces to showing that the $3$-transitive group $\mathrm{AGL}(n,2)$ satisfies the strict-EKR property. We show that $\mathrm{AGL}(n,2)$ satisfies the strict-EKR property and as a consequence, we prove Meagher and Spiga's conjecture. We also prove a stronger result for $\mathrm{AGL}(n,2)$ by showing that "large" intersecting sets in $\mathrm{AGL}(n,2)$ must be a subset of a canonical intersecting set. This phenomenon is called stability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Venkata Raghu Tej Pantangi. 2023-11-21. All $3$-transitive groups satisfy the strict-EKR property. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO