Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2312.03561

Blueprinting the Future: Automatic Item Categorization using Hierarchical Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Classifiers

Abstract

In testing industry, precise item categorization is pivotal to align exam questions with the designated content domains outlined in the assessment blueprint. Traditional methods either entail manual classification, which is laborious and error-prone, or utilize machine learning requiring extensive training data, often leading to model underfit or overfit issues. This study unveils a novel approach employing the zero-shot and few-shot Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) classifier for hierarchical item categorization, minimizing the necessity for training data, and instead, leveraging human-like language descriptions to define categories. Through a structured python dictionary, the hierarchical nature of examination blueprints is navigated seamlessly, allowing for a tiered classification of items across multiple levels. An initial simulation with artificial data demonstrates the efficacy of this method, achieving an average accuracy of 92.91% measured by the F1 score. This method was further applied to real exam items from the 2022 In-Training Examination (ITE) conducted by the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), reclassifying 200 items according to a newly formulated blueprint swiftly in 15 minutes, a task that traditionally could span several days among editors and physicians. This innovative approach not only drastically cuts down classification time but also ensures a consistent, principle-driven categorization, minimizing human biases and discrepancies. The ability to refine classifications by adjusting definitions adds to its robustness and sustainability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ting Wang, Keith Stelter, Jenn Floyd, Thomas O'Neill, Nathaniel Hendrix, Andrew Bazemore, Kevin Rode, Warren Newton. 2023-12-06. Blueprinting the Future: Automatic Item Categorization using Hierarchical Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Classifiers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03561

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME