Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.04588

How big a table do you need for your jigsaw puzzle?

Madeleine Bonsma-Fisher·Kent Bonsma-Fisher
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Jigsaw puzzles are typically labeled with their finished area and number of pieces. With this information, is it possible to estimate the area required to lay each piece flat before assembly? We derive a simple formula based on two-dimensional circular packing and show that the unassembled puzzle area is $\sqrt{3}$ times the assembled puzzle area, independent of the number of pieces. We perform measurements on 9 puzzles ranging from 333 cm$^2$ (9 pieces) to 6798 cm$^2$ (2000 pieces) and show that the formula accurately predicts realistic assembly scenarios.

Explore related subjects

math.HOphysics.pop-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Madeleine Bonsma-Fisher, Kent Bonsma-Fisher. 2023-12-05. How big a table do you need for your jigsaw puzzle?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04588

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO↗