Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.09388

Utilizing Novel Quantum Counters for Grover's Algorithm to Solve the Dominating Set Problem

Jehn-Ruey Jiang·Qiao-Yi Lin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Grover's algorithm is a well-known unstructured quantum search algorithm run on quantum computers. It constructs an oracle and calls the oracle O($\sqrt N$) times to locate specific data out of N unsorted data. This represents a quadratic speedup compared to the classical unstructured data sequential search algorithm, which requires to call the oracle O(N) times. We are currently in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era in which quantum computers have a limited number of qubits, short decoherence time, and low gate fidelity. It is thus desirable to design quantum components with three good properties: (i) a reduced number of qubits, (ii) shorter quantum depth, and (iii) fewer gates. This paper utilizes novel quantum counters with the above-mentioned three good properties to construct the oracle of Grover's algorithm to efficiently solve the dominating set problem (DSP), as defined below. For a given graph G=(V, E), a dominating set (DS) D is a subset of the vertex set V, such that every vertex is in D or has an adjacent vertex in D. The DSP is to decide for a given graph G and an integer k whether there exists a DS with size k. Algorithms solving the DSP have many applications. For example, they can be applied to check whether k routers suffice to connect all computers in a computer network. The DSP is an NP-complete problem, indicating that no classical algorithm exists to solve the DSP with polynomial time complexity in the worst case. Therefore, using quantum algorithms, such as Grover's algorithm, to exploit the potent computational capabilities of quantum computers to solve the DSP is highly promising. We execute the whole quantum circuit of Grover's algorithm using novel quantum counters through the IBM Quantum Lab service to validate that the circuit can solve the DSP efficiently and correctly.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jehn-Ruey Jiang, Qiao-Yi Lin. 2023-12-14. Utilizing Novel Quantum Counters for Grover's Algorithm to Solve the Dominating Set Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC↗