Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.09454

Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review

Ivo Pascal de Jong·Andreea Ioana Sburlea·Matias Valdenegro-Toro
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Purpose: Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) has gained traction in an attempt to improve the interpretability and robustness of machine learning predictions. Specifically (medical) biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electrooculography (EOG), and electromyography (EMG) could benefit from good UQ, since these suffer from a poor signal-to-noise ratio, and good human interpretability is pivotal for medical applications. To determine how uncertainty estimation can be used for biosignal tasks, we investigate current methods, use cases, applications, evaluations, and uncertainty measures. Methods: In this paper, we systematically review the state of the art of applying Uncertainty Quantification to Machine Learning tasks in the biosignal domain. All works from Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE XPlore and PsycINFO that discuss uncertainty in Machine Learning on one of the aforementioned biosignals is included. Results: We present various methods, shortcomings, uncertainty measures and theoretical frameworks that currently exist in this application domain based on the 53 reviewed papers and related literature. We address misconceptions in the field, provide recommendations for future work, and discuss gaps in the literature in relation to diagnostic implementations as well as control for prostheses or brain-computer interfaces. Conclusion: Overall it can be concluded that promising UQ methods are available, but that research is needed on how people and systems may interact with an uncertainty-model in a (clinical) environment.

Explore related subjects

eess.SPcs.HCcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ivo Pascal de Jong, Andreea Ioana Sburlea, Matias Valdenegro-Toro. 2026-09-03. Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09454

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.HC subjectcs.LG subjecteess.SP subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Elastic to Viscoelastic: An EEMD-Enhanced Pulse Transit Time Model for Robust Blood Pressure Estimation

Cuffless blood pressure (BP) estimation based on Pulse Transit Time (PTT) has emerged as a promising solution for continuous health monitoring. However, conventional models relying on the Moens-Korteweg equation often fail during rapid hemodynamic fluctuations, as they assume arterial walls are purely elastic and neglect inherent viscoelasticity. To address this limitation, we propose a physics-informed framework introducing a viscoelastic compensation mechanism. First, raw photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals undergo high-fidelity reconstruction using Modified Akima (Makima) interpolation. Second, a robust Intersecting Tangent Method is applied for precise pulse foot localization. Crucially, we utilize Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) to isolate high-frequency Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs), defining a ``Viscoelastic Velocity Metric'' to quantify the vascular damping effect ($η\cdot \dotε$) typically ignored by elastic models. The framework was rigorously validated on a challenging subset of the MIMIC-II database (364 subjects, 28,525 cardiac cycles) characterized by a high prevalence of hypertension (23.4\%). Experimental results demonstrate medical-grade accuracy, yielding a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 5.22 mmHg for Systolic and 3.65 mmHg for Diastolic BP, with Pearson correlation coefficients ($R > 0.97$). These findings confirm that incorporating viscoelastic features significantly enhances robustness against vascular hysteresis.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Slow-Fast Brain-Computer Interfaces: Preventing Neuroadaptive Overfitting in AI-Mediated Neural Interfaces

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) from task-specific neural decoders into adaptive systems that complete language, smooth movement, regulate rehabilitation support and adjust stimulation. These capabilities can increase speed, fluency, usability and clinical reach, yet conventional performance metrics may overlook losses in intent fidelity, authorship, agency, therapeutic challenge and durable clinical benefit. I define neuroadaptive overfitting as a closed-loop failure mode in which an AI-mediated BCI becomes over-optimized to short-term proxies of success, including reduced effort, rapid acceptance, lower workload or smooth task completion, while drifting from the user's durable goals. I then propose Slow-Fast BCI, a framework for pacing AI assistance according to decoder evidence, uncertainty, contextual and clinical stakes, fatigue, and user- or clinician-defined goals. The framework distinguishes fast assistance when intent is clear and stakes are low, guarded assistance under uncertainty and slow assistance when misalignment could compromise safety, agency, authorship, motor learning or therapeutic value. Across communication, motor-control, neurorehabilitation and closed-loop neuromodulation applications, I outline corresponding safeguards and evaluation measures. This Perspective argues that AI-mediated BCIs should be evaluated not only by decoding accuracy and task performance, but also by how AI assistance is deployed: when systems act autonomously, seek confirmation, preserve user effort or return control to the user.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Deep Learning Approach to Bearing and Induction Motor Fault Diagnosis via Data Fusion

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are used to evaluate accelerometer and microphone data for bearing and induction motor diagnosis. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network is used to combine sensor information effectively, highlighting the benefits of data fusion. This approach encourages researchers to focus on multi model diagnosis for constant speed data collection by proposing a comprehensive way to use deep learning and sensor fusion and encourages data scientists to collect more multi-sensor data, including acoustic and accelerometer datasets.

cs.LG↗