Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Physics and Machine Learning Based Approaches

Minghan Chu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.14684

Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Physics and Machine Learning Based Approaches

Minghan Chu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Turbulent flow has been extensively studied using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations since turbulent flow regime is so frequently encountered in both academic and engineering applications. The high-fidelity simulation of the Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) requires a sufficiently fine mesh to resolve the smallest Kolmogorov length scale of turbulent motion, which requires a tremendous amount of computational resources, and hence usually prohibited in engineering applications. At the current state of computational power we can only execute DNS simulations for small sections of an aircraft wing at high Reynolds numbers. Even though large-eddy simulation (LES) has reduced the computational overheads by only resolving the large-scale eddies with the small-scale eddies being modelled. However, for extremely high Reynolds number and complex geometry flows LES is still restricted to academic studies. As the result, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based turbulence models have significantly reduced the computational overheads by modeling all scales of turbulent motion. Unlike DNS and LES which are dedicated to representing the true physics of turbulent flows, RANS approach uses simplifying modeling assumptions to describe both lower order and higher order quantities. This makes RANS still remain the most widely used CFD method in engineering applications; however, simplifying assumptions also introduces sources uncertainties during simulation.

Explore related subjects

physics.flu-dyn

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Minghan Chu. 2024-05-20. Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Physics and Machine Learning Based Approaches. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14684

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Kinetic closure of turbulence

This letter presents a kinetic closure of the filtered Boltzmann--BGK equation, paving the way toward an alternative description of turbulence. The closure retains the turbulent subfilter stress tensor without a separate Smagorinsky-type ansatz for its structure, unlike classical filtered Navier--Stokes closures. In contrast, it accounts for the subfilter turbulent diffusion in the nonconserved moments by generalizing the BGK collision operator. The model does not require scale separation between resolved and unresolved scales. The Chapman--Enskog analysis shows how its hydrodynamic limit can converge to the filtered Navier--Stokes equations, with velocity gradients isolating subfilter contributions. Numerical tests on the Taylor--Green vortex and the turbulent mixing layer show improved stability and reduced dissipation in the reported cases, benchmarked against the Smagorinsky model.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2026

Kinetic closure of turbulence: collision-side modeling beyond the filtered Boltzmann equation

This article extends a recently introduced kinetic closure of turbulence by developing its theoretical framework, operational realizations, and validation. In contrast with filtered Navier--Stokes formulations, filtering the Boltzmann equation retains subgrid transport under the linear streaming operator, so that unresolved physics is concentrated on the collision side. We show that in dilute-gas large-eddy simulation, the main limitation of Bhatnagar--Gross--Krook (BGK)-type collision models is not the breakdown of molecular chaos, but the retention of a Markovian collision at a scale where filtering can induce finite temporal correlations in the collision product. In a BGK-type framework, the closure problem is dual: one must infer the filtered fine-grained equilibrium, not computable from filtered moments alone, and model the non-Markovian collision dynamics generated by the collision-product covariance. The present framework makes this dual structure explicit and represents the resulting collision-covariance source term through a BGK-like closure built from the equilibrium commutation residual, with the turbulent relaxation frequency given by a first phenomenological realization. The framework relies on a Chapman--Enskog analysis organized by the reference timescale ratio emerging from the nondimensionalization of the kinetic equation, performed in the classical sense, thereby avoiding artificial turbulent scale separations. We show that the Chapman--Enskog structure is not a pure one-parameter Knudsen scaling: the primary ordering is set by the kinetic-to-macroscopic timescale ratio, while higher moments retain an additional Mach dependence through the mixed scaling of particle velocity. The resulting kinetic closures are validated through lattice Boltzmann simulations and compared with the Smagorinsky model and regularization-based collision models.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2026

Deep Koopman Sensing

Real-time reconstruction of fluid flows from sparse sensor measurements is important for both physical understanding and flow control. When first-principles models are too expensive for online data assimilation (DA), learned reduced-order models provide an efficient alternative, but are commonly optimized for forward prediction rather than state estimation. We propose Deep Koopman Sensing, a data-driven reduced-order DA framework that combines a nonlinear autoencoder with parameter-conditioned linear latent dynamics approximating the Koopman operator. We compare the proposed model with parametric dynamic mode decomposition (pDMD), a multilayer perceptron (MLP), and xLSTM across four benchmarks: 1D viscous Burgers, 2D flow past a cylinder, 2D dambreak, and 3D flow past a sphere. Our results reveal a marked distinction between forecasting and sensing: open-loop accuracy does not reliably predict assimilation performance, while Deep Koopman Sensing achieves the lowest assimilation error across all four benchmarks. More importantly, with an extended Kalman filter, incorporating sensor measurements improves the estimates of both linear latent models across all four benchmarks, whereas it degrades the nonlinear models, despite their strong open-loop performance. With ensemble filtering, the nonlinear models are no longer degraded by assimilation, while the Koopman model still attains the lowest assimilation error. These results show that latent dynamics should be designed for the downstream estimation task rather than selected solely for forecast accuracy, and demonstrate Koopman-based reduced-order modeling as an effective approach for real-time flow reconstruction from sparse, streaming measurements.

physics.flu-dyn↗