Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2312.16205

Shifting Beliefs Changing Behavior: Experimental Evidence on Sanitation from India

Abstract

Open defecation, which is linked to poor health outcomes and lower cognitive ability has been widespread in India. Improved sanitation practice generates local health externalities, which implies that the returns to private toilet usage depend on community wide compliance. Therefore, beliefs about others toilet usage behavior may influence both sanitation choices and the perceived value of residing in areas with lower prevalence of open defecation. This paper evaluates a randomized, intervention in peri-urban Tamil Nadu designed to shift social expectations regarding sanitation practice. The intervention combines descriptive norm messaging, community engagement, and information provision to increase perceived prevalence and approval of toilet usage. The findings indicate a significant increase in toilet access in the intervention areas by 8 percentage points and consistent toilet usage by 6 to 7 percentage points relative to control areas. The effects are robust to potential bias due to disruption due to local socio-political protest and the COVID 19 pandemic during the study period. We also find significant increase in empirical expectations (beliefs about the prevalence of toilet usage) and normative expectations (beliefs about its approval). Mediation analysis indicates that the improvement in toilet access and usage is substantially driven by changes in these social expectations. We further observe significant increase in the willingness to pay among respondents for residing in open defecation free surroundings, suggestive of an increased perceived valuation of cleaner sanitation environments because of the intervention. The findings underscore the need for norm-centric interventions to propel change in beliefs and achieve long-term and sustainable sanitation behavior.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sania Ashraf, Cristina Bicchieri, Upasak Das, Alex Shpenev. 2026-04-03. Shifting Beliefs Changing Behavior: Experimental Evidence on Sanitation from India. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16205

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The time interpretation of expected utility theory

Ergodicity economics is a new branch of economic theory that notes the conceptual difference between time averages and expectation values, which coincide only for ergodic observables. It postulates that individual agents maximise the time average growth rate of wealth, known widely as growth optimality. This contrasts with the dominant behavioural model in economics, expected utility theory, in which agents maximise expectation values of changes in psychologically transformed wealth. Historically, growth optimality was explored for additive and multiplicative gambles. Here we apply it to a general class of wealth dynamics, extending the range of economic situations where it may be used. Moreover, we show a correspondence between growth optimality and expected utility theory, in which the ergodicity transformation in the former is identified as the utility function in the latter. This correspondence offers a theoretical basis for choosing utility functions and predicts that wealth dynamics are strong determinants of risk preferences.

econ.GN

Monetary Regimes and Trade before the Classical Gold Standard: Evidence from the Latin Monetary Union

This paper reexamines the trade effects of the Latin Monetary Union (LMU), a 19th century agreement to standardize gold and silver coinage among several European countries. The LMU provides a useful setting for studying whether monetary arrangements fostered trade before the classical gold standard, when gold, silver, bimetallic, and paper regimes coexisted. Because some countries already shared other monetary standards, treating all non-member pairs as a single control group mixes pairs with and without alternative forms of monetary coordination. I classify pairs by standard and estimate the LMU effect relative to pairs without a common standard, bringing the comparison closer to those used in the literature on the gold standard and contemporary currency unions. The results suggest that the LMU increased trade between its members by approximately 30\% during its early years, when bimetallism was still credible. These effects subsequently faded, converging to zero by the end of the 1870s. More broadly, these findings also highlight the importance of accounting for the existing monetary regimes when estimating the trade effects of other international policies.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN