Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2401.05347

Income and emotional well-being: Evidence for well-being plateauing around $200,000 per year

Abstract

Is emotional well-being monotonically increasing in the level of income or does it reach a plateau at some income threshold, whereafter additional income does not contribute to further well-being? Conflicting answers to this question has been suggested in the academic literature. In a recent paper, using an income threshold of $100,000 per year, Killingsworth et al. (2023) appears to have resolved these conflicts, concluding that emotional well-being is monotonically increasing in income for all but the unhappiest individuals. In this paper, we show that this conclusion is sensitive to the placement of the income threshold at which the relationship between emotional well-being and income is allowed to plateau. Using standard econometric methods, we propose a data-driven approach to detect the placement of the threshold. Using this data-driven income threshold, a flat relationship between household income and emotional well-being above a threshold around $200,000 per year is found. While our analysis relaxes the assumption of a pre-specified income threshold, it relies on a number of other assumptions, which we briefly discuss. We conclude that although the analysis of this paper provides some evidence for well-being plateauing around $200,000 per year, more research is needed before any definite conclusions about the relationship between emotional well-being and income can be drawn.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mikkel Bennedsen. 2024-01-24. Income and emotional well-being: Evidence for well-being plateauing around $200,000 per year. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05347

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN