Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2401.13670

"The Roller Conduction Effect" from the A-share Data Evidence

Abstract

In the post-epidemic era, consumption recovery has obvious time and space transmission laws, and there are different valuation criteria for consumption segments. Using the A-share data of the consumption recovery stage from January to April 2022, this paper quantitatively compares the rotation effect between different consumption sectors when the valuation returns to the reasonable range. According to the new classification of "sensory-based consumption", it interprets the internal logic of digital consumption as A consumption upgrade tool and a higher valuation target, and expounds the "the roller conduction effect". The law of consumption recovery and valuation return period is explained from the perspective of time and space conduction. The study found that in the early stage of consumption recovery, the recovery of consumer confidence was slow. In this period, A-shares were mainly dominated by the stock capital game, and there was an obvious plate rotation law in the game. Being familiar with this law has strong significance, which not only helps policy makers to adjust the direction of policy guidance, but also helps financial investors to make better investment strategies. The disadvantage of this paper is that it has not yet studied the roller conduction effect of the global financial market, and more rigorous mathematical models are still needed to support the definition of stock funds, which is also the main direction of the author's future research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wenbo Lyu. 2023-10-16. "The Roller Conduction Effect" from the A-share Data Evidence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13670

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN