Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2401.13687

Econometric Approach to Analyzing Determinants of Sustained Prosperity

Abstract

Every year, substantial resources are allocated to foreign aid with the aim of catalyzing prosperity and development in recipient countries. The diverse body of research on the relationship between aid and gross domestic product (GDP) has yielded varying results, finding evidence of both positive, negative, and negligible associations between the two. This study employs econometric techniques, namely Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares Regression (FMOLS) and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), to explore the intricate links between innovation and different types of official development assistance (ODA) with the overarching construct of prosperity. The paper also reviews the linkages between foundational metrics, such as the rule of law, education, and economic infrastructure and services, in enabling self-sustaining prosperity. Drawing upon panel data of relevant determinants for 74 countries across the years 2013 to 2021, the study found that there was a negligible relationship between both ODA and innovation indices with prosperity. Notably, foreign aid targeted specifically toward education was observed to have a positive impact on prosperity, as was the presence of rule of law in a state. The results of the study are then examined through the lens of a case-study on Reliance Jio, exemplifying how the company engineered an ecosystem that harnessed resources and facilitated infrastructure development, thereby contributing to self-sustaining economic growth and prosperity in India.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anika Dixit. 2023-12-22. Econometric Approach to Analyzing Determinants of Sustained Prosperity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13687

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN