Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2402.02589

Prospective Prediction of Body Mass Index Trajectories using Multi-task Gaussian Processes

Abstract

Clinicians often investigate the body mass index (BMI) trajectories of children to assess their growth with respect to their peers, as well as to anticipate future growth and disease risk. While retrospective modelling of BMI trajectories has been an active area of research, prospective prediction of continuous BMI trajectories from historical growth data has not been well investigated. Using weight and height measurements from birth to age 10 years from a longitudinal mother-offspring cohort, we leveraged a multi-task Gaussian processes model, called MagmaClust, to derive probabilistic predictions for BMI trajectories over various forecasting periods. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity to missing values, and number of clusters. The results were compared with cubic B-spline regression and a parametric Jenss-Bayley mixed effects model. A downstream tool computing individual overweight probabilities was also proposed and evaluated. In all experiments, MagmaClust outperformed conventional models in prediction accuracy while correctly calibrating uncertainty regardless of the missing data amount (up to 90\% missing) or the forecasting period (from 2 to 8 years in the future). Moreover, the overweight probabilities computed from MagmaClust's uncertainty quantification exhibited high specificity ($0.94$ to $0.96$) and accuracy ($0.86$ to $0.94$) in predicting the 10-year overweight status even from age 2 years. MagmaClust provides a probabilistic non-parametric framework to prospectively predict BMI trajectories, which is robust to missing values and outperforms conventional BMI trajectory modelling approaches. It also clusters individuals to identify typical BMI patterns (early peak, adiposity rebounds) during childhood. Overall, we demonstrated its potential to anticipate BMI evolution throughout childhood, allowing clinicians to implement prevention strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arthur Leroy, Varsha Gupta, Mya Thway Tint, Delicia Ooi Shu Qin, Keith M. Godfrey, Fabian Yap, Leck Ngee, Yung Seng Lee, Johan G. Eriksson, Navin Michael, Mauricio A. Alvarez, Dennis Wang. 2024-02-04. Prospective Prediction of Body Mass Index Trajectories using Multi-task Gaussian Processes. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01679-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Relegation, promotion and the components of scoring in water polo

Relegation, not the championship, decides the outcome of many European water polo leagues: one club has won every recent national title in Italy, Spain and Hungary. We make the relegation decision our object of inference. Serie A1 relegates one club for finishing last and a second through a three-match play-out, and we ask at each stage how much can be known and when. Promoted clubs arrive with no top-flight record, so we also compare four ways of setting their prior. These analyses rest on the first Bayesian hierarchical model of water polo, which splits scoring into even-strength, man-up and penalty components, models opportunities and conversions separately, and lets abilities evolve between seasons. Treating the components as independent proves untenable, since they compete for a common budget of possessions. Fitted to a new dataset of 940 matches, the model identifies the directly relegated club from the ninth round, before the league table does, predicts the play-out field better than the table, and shows the play-out itself to be close to a coin toss. Promoted clubs start below the league on every component except drawing exclusions: knowing a club was promoted improves forecasts; knowing how does not.

stat.AP

Geospatial Foundation Models Capture Health-Relevant Dimensions of Place Beyond Conventional Social Risk Indices

Area-based social risk indices summarize residents' socioeconomic conditions but incompletely capture physical features of place that may affect health. We evaluated whether numerical representations of physical place produced by four geospatial foundation model families from 2022 satellite data explained residual variance in tract-level associations between the Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and Social Vulnerability Index with health outcomes. We used LightGBM to predict variables from the American Community Survey and 40 chronic disease and health-behavior outcomes from CDC PLACES across 82,646 census tracts in the contiguous United States, evaluating performance across 10 held-out states. Among survey variables, models were moderately predictive of some variables including housing type (R-squared up to 0.54) but weak for disability, unemployment, and income disparity. For health outcomes, models explained up to 54% of variance left unexplained by social risk indices, with the largest gains for annual checkups, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Mean total variance explained by geospatial foundation models across the 40 health-related outcomes increased from 0.31 in the smallest tract-size decile to 0.39 in the largest. Geospatial foundation models capture health-relevant features of place not represented by conventional social risk indices and may usefully augment them in epidemiological analyses.

stat.AP

Transporting summary measures of relative effects from randomised trials to the treated patient population: an application to breast cancer endocrine therapy

Randomised trials often report relative treatment effects, such as risk ratios and hazard ratios, for trial populations. Clinical decision-making, however, often benefits from estimates of absolute treatment effects in the population eligible for treatment. Trial participants may not represent this target population well, and restrictions on access to individual participant trial data can further complicate absolute effect estimation. Routine care data are often representative of the target population but may be subject to uncontrolled confounding. We consider estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an absolute measure, by combining a representative sample of treated routine care patients with summary measures (i.e., estimated risk or hazard ratios) from either a randomised trial or a meta-analysis of trials. Under marginal or conditional transportability assumptions, the ATT is shown to be identifiable. The implications of collapsibility of the effect measure on transportability are discussed, and plug-in estimators of the ATT are presented. Simulation studies are used to assess finite sample performance of the estimators in a range of settings. The proposed methods are applied to estimate the ATT of endocrine therapy on 15-year breast cancer mortality using results from a meta-analysis of randomised trials and England's National Disease Registration Service.

stat.AP