Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2402.11936

Relative Jump Distance: a diagnostic for Nested Sampling

Johannes Buchner
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Nested sampling is widely used in astrophysics for reliably inferring model parameters and comparing models within a Bayesian framework. To address models with many parameters, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) random walks are incorporated within nested sampling to advance a live point population. Diagnostic tools for nested sampling are crucial to ensure the reliability of astrophysical conclusions. We develop a diagnostic to identify problematic random walks that fail to meet the requirements of nested sampling. The distance from the start to the end of the random walk, the jump distance, is divided by the typical neighbor distance between live points, computed robustly with the MLFriends algorithm, to obtain a relative jump distance (RJD). We propose the geometric mean RJD and the fraction of RJD>1 as new summary diagnostics. Relative jump distances are investigated with mock and real-world inference applications, including inferring the distance to gravitational wave event GW170817. Problematic nested sampling runs are identified based on significant differences to reruns with much longer MCMC chains. These consistently exhibit low average RJDs and f(RJD>1) values below 50 percent. The RJD is more sensitive than previous tests based on the live point insertion order. The RJD diagnostic is proposed as a widely applicable diagnostic to verify inference with nested sampling. It is implemented in the UltraNest package in version 4.1.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEastro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Buchner. 2024-02-19. Relative Jump Distance: a diagnostic for Nested Sampling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11936

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗