Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2402.12110

The Complexity of Geodesic Spanners using Steiner Points

Abstract

A geometric $t$-spanner $\mathcal{G}$ on a set $S$ of $n$ point sites in a metric space $P$ is a subgraph of the complete graph on $S$ such that for every pair of sites $p,q$ the distance in $\mathcal{G}$ is a most $t$ times the distance $d(p,q)$ in $P$. We call a connection between two sites a \emph{link}. In some settings, such as when $P$ is a simple polygon with $m$ vertices and a link is a shortest path in $P$, links can consist of $\Theta (m)$ segments and thus have non-constant complexity. The spanner complexity is a measure of how compact a spanner is, which is equal to the sum of the complexities of all links in the spanner. In this paper, we study what happens if we are allowed to introduce $k$ Steiner points to reduce the spanner complexity. We study such Steiner spanners in simple polygons, polygonal domains, and edge-weighted trees. We show that Steiner points have only limited utility. For a spanner that uses $k$ Steiner points, we provide an $\Omega(mn^{1/(t+1)}/k^{1/(t+1)})$ lower bound on the worst-case complexity of any $(t-\varepsilon)$-spanner, for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ and integer constant $t \geq 2$. Additionally, we show NP-hardness for the problem of deciding whether a set of sites in a polygonal domain admits a $3$-spanner with a given maximum complexity using $k$ Steiner points. On the positive side, for trees we show how to build a $2t$-spanner that uses $k$ Steiner points of complexity $O(mn^{1/t}/k^{1/t} + n \log (n/k))$, for any integer $t \geq 1$. We generalize this to forests, and use it to obtain a $2\sqrt{2}t$-spanner in a simple polygon with complexity $O(mn^{1/t}(\log k)^{1+1/t}/k^{1/t} + n\log^2 n)$. When a link can be any path between two sites, we show how to improve the spanning ratio to $(2k+\varepsilon)$, for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0,2k)$, and how to build a $6t$-spanner in a polygonal domain with the same complexity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sarita de Berg, Tim Ophelders, Irene Parada, Frank Staals, Jules Wulms. 2024-02-19. The Complexity of Geodesic Spanners using Steiner Points. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12110

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG