Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2402.13936

Distinctive Image Captioning: Leveraging Ground Truth Captions in CLIP Guided Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

Training image captioning models using teacher forcing results in very generic samples, whereas more distinctive captions can be very useful in retrieval applications or to produce alternative texts describing images for accessibility. Reinforcement Learning (RL) allows to use cross-modal retrieval similarity score between the generated caption and the input image as reward to guide the training, leading to more distinctive captions. Recent studies show that pre-trained cross-modal retrieval models can be used to provide this reward, completely eliminating the need for reference captions. However, we argue in this paper that Ground Truth (GT) captions can still be useful in this RL framework. We propose a new image captioning model training strategy that makes use of GT captions in different ways. Firstly, they can be used to train a simple MLP discriminator that serves as a regularization to prevent reward hacking and ensures the fluency of generated captions, resulting in a textual GAN setup extended for multimodal inputs. Secondly, they can serve as additional trajectories in the RL strategy, resulting in a teacher forcing loss weighted by the similarity of the GT to the image. This objective acts as an additional learning signal grounded to the distribution of the GT captions. Thirdly, they can serve as strong baselines when added to the pool of captions used to compute the proposed contrastive reward to reduce the variance of gradient estimate. Experiments on MS-COCO demonstrate the interest of the proposed training strategy to produce highly distinctive captions while maintaining high writing quality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antoine Chaffin, Ewa Kijak, Vincent Claveau. 2024-02-21. Distinctive Image Captioning: Leveraging Ground Truth Captions in CLIP Guided Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13936

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

What is the Role of Small Models in the LLM Era: A Survey

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various reasoning tasks, which leads to the development of increasingly large models. However, scaling up model sizes results in significantly higher computational costs and energy consumption, which makes these models impractical for academic researchers and businesses with limited resources. At the same time, Small Models (SMs) are frequently used in practical settings, although their significance is currently underestimated. This raises important questions about the role of small models in the era of LLMs, a topic that has received limited attention in prior surveys. In this work, we systematically examine the relationship between LLMs and SMs from two key perspectives: Collaboration and Competition (or Complementarity). We hope this survey provides valuable insights for practitioners, fostering a deeper understanding of the contribution of small models and promoting more efficient use of computational resources.

cs.CL

SG-FSM: A Self-Guiding Zero-Shot Prompting Paradigm for Multi-Hop Question Answering Based on Finite State Machine

Large Language Models with chain-of-thought prompting, such as OpenAI-o1, have shown impressive capabilities in natural language inference tasks. However, Multi-hop Question Answering (MHQA) remains challenging for many existing models due to issues like hallucination, error propagation, and limited context length. To address these challenges and enhance LLMs' performance on MHQA, we propose the Self-Guiding prompting Finite State Machine (SG-FSM), designed to strengthen multi-hop reasoning abilities. Unlike traditional chain-of-thought methods, SG-FSM tackles MHQA by iteratively breaking down complex questions into sub-questions, correcting itself to improve accuracy. It processes one sub-question at a time, dynamically deciding the next step based on the current context and results, functioning much like an automaton. Experiments across various benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, outperforming strong baselines on challenging datasets such as Musique. SG-FSM reduces hallucination, enabling recovery of the correct final answer despite intermediate errors. It also improves adherence to specified output formats, simplifying evaluation significantly.

cs.CL

A Course Intelligence Platform for Higher Education: Lessons from AI-Assisted Course Evaluation

The rapid adoption of generative AI has created new opportunities for teaching, learning, and quality assurance. Existing applications, however, remain largely student-facing, with comparatively limited attention to institution-level needs. This paper presents a course intelligence platform deployed across more than 100 universities and serving over 10,000 instructors in China. By linking competency requirements, knowledge structures, teaching activities, and assessment evidence, it establishes a shared foundation for knowledge organization, instructional design, learning assessment, and quality evaluation. The course evaluation module is examined as a representative institution-facing application of the platform, which integrates national evaluation standards, structured educational evidence, customized prompting strategies, and domain-adapted LLMs to generate quantitative scores and qualitative feedback. A case study involving 100 authentic university courses is conducted to evaluate its alignment with expert judgments and the interpretability of its outputs. Statistical analyses show substantial agreement between AI-generated assessments and expert ratings, while qualitative results highlight the credibility of the feedback. The findings further suggest that AI-assisted evaluation requires not only capable models but also structured domain knowledge and transparent criteria. In this context, human ratings should be treated as an informative reference rather than an error-free gold standard, and the objective is to achieve consistent, interpretable, and defensible judgments instead of merely replicating expert scores.

cs.CL