On the Complexity of Community-aware Network Sparsification

Emanuel Herrendorf; Christian Komusiewicz; Nils Morawietz; Frank Sommer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2402.15494

On the Complexity of Community-aware Network Sparsification

Emanuel Herrendorf·Christian Komusiewicz·Nils Morawietz·Frank Sommer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Network sparsification is the task of reducing the number of edges of a given graph while preserving some crucial graph property. In community-aware network sparsification, the preserved property concerns the subgraphs that are induced by the communities of the graph which are given as vertex subsets. This is formalized in the $\Pi$-Network Sparsification problem: given an edge-weighted graph $G$, a collection $Z$ of $c$ subsets of $V(G)$ (communities), and two numbers $\ell, b$, the question is whether there exists a spanning subgraph $G'$ of $G$ with at most $\ell$ edges of total weight at most $b$ such that $G'[C]$ fulfills $\Pi$ for each community $C$. Here, we consider two graph properties $\Pi$: the connectivity property (Connectivity NWS) and the property of having a spanning star (Stars NWS). Since both problems are NP-hard, we study their parameterized and fine-grained complexity. We provide a tight $2^{\Omega(n^2+c)} poly(n+|Z|)$-time running time lower bound based on the ETH for both problems, where $n$ is the number of vertices in $G$. The lower bound holds even in the restricted case when all communities have size at most 4, $G$ is a clique, and every edge has unit weight. For the connectivity property, the unit weight case with $G$ being a clique is the well-studied problem of computing a hypergraph support with a minimum number of edges. We then study the complexity of both problems parameterized by the feedback edge number $t$ of the solution graph $G'$. For Stars NWS, we present an XP-algorithm for $t$. This answers an open question by Korach and Stern [Disc. Appl. Math. '08] who asked for the existence of polynomial-time algorithms for $t=0$. In contrast, we show for Connectivity NWS that known polynomial-time algorithms for $t=0$ [Korach and Stern, Math. Program. '03; Klemz et al., SWAT '14] cannot be extended by showing that Connectivity NWS is NP-hard for $t=1$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Emanuel Herrendorf, Christian Komusiewicz, Nils Morawietz, Frank Sommer. 2024-02-23. On the Complexity of Community-aware Network Sparsification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15494

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗