Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2402.16175

XAI-based gait analysis of patients walking with Knee-Ankle-Foot orthosis using video cameras

Abstract

Recent technological advancements in artificial intelligence and computer vision have enabled gait analysis on portable devices such as cell phones. However, most state-of-the-art vision-based systems still impose numerous constraints for capturing a patient's video, such as using a static camera and maintaining a specific distance from it. While these constraints are manageable under professional observation, they pose challenges in home settings. Another issue with most vision-based systems is their output, typically a classification label and confidence value, whose reliability is often questioned by medical professionals. This paper addresses these challenges by presenting a novel system for gait analysis robust to camera movements and providing explanations for its output. The study utilizes a dataset comprising videos of subjects wearing two types of Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO), namely "Locked Knee" and "Semi-flexion," for mobility, along with metadata and ground truth for explanations. The ground truth highlights the statistical significance of seven features captured using motion capture systems to differentiate between the two gaits. To address camera movement challenges, the proposed system employs super-resolution and pose estimation during pre-processing. It then identifies the seven features - Stride Length, Step Length and Duration of single support of orthotic and non-orthotic leg, Cadence, and Speed - using the skeletal output of pose estimation. These features train a multi-layer perceptron, with its output explained by highlighting the features' contribution to classification. While most state-of-the-art systems struggle with processing the video or training on the proposed dataset, our system achieves an average accuracy of 94%. The model's explainability is validated using ground truth and can be considered reliable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arnav Mishra, Aditi Shetkar, Ganesh M. Bapat, Rajdeep Ojha, Tanmay Tulsidas Verlekar. 2024-02-25. XAI-based gait analysis of patients walking with Knee-Ankle-Foot orthosis using video cameras. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV