Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2403.00478

Admissable sets do not exist for all parameters

Abstract

A cap set in $\mathbb{F}_3^n$ is a subset that contains no three elements adding to 0. Building on a construction of Edel, a recent paper of Tyrrell gave the first improvement to the lower bound for a size of a cap set in two decades showing that, for large enough $n$, there is always a cap set in $\mathbb{F}_3^n$ of size at least $2.218^n$. This was shown by constructing what is called an $I(11,7)$ admissible set. An admissible set is a subset of $\{0,1,2\}^m$ such that the supports of the vectors form an antichain with respect to inclusion and each triple of vectors has some coordinate where either exactly one of them is non-zero or exactly two are and they have different values. Such an admissible set is said to be $I(m,w)$ if it is of size $\binom mw$ and all of the vectors have exactly $w$ non-zero elements. In Tyrrell's paper they conjectured that $I(m,w)$ admissible set exists for all parameters. We resolve this conjecture by showing that there exists an $N$ such that an $I(N,4)$ admissible set does not exist. We refer to the type of a vector in $\{0,1,2\}^m$ is the ordered sequence of its non-zero coefficients. The vectors of type $12$ form an $I(m,2)$ admissible set and the vectors of type $121$ form an $I(m,3)$ admissible set (as can be easily checked by an interested reader). Sadly it is quite easily proved that there is no $I(6,4)$ admissible set where all vectors are of the same type. It follows by Ramsey's Theorem applied to 4-regular hypergraphs that there exists an $N$ such that an $I(N,4)$ admissible set does not exist. A similar argument shows that there exists an $N'$ such that an $I(N',N'-2)$ admissible set does not exist. Since we can construct an $I(m-1,w)$ and an $I(m-1,w-1)$ admissible set from an $I(m,w)$ admissible set, it follows that there are only finitely many $I(m,w)$ admissible sets exist other than the known forms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luke Pebody. 2024-03-01. Admissable sets do not exist for all parameters. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00478

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Small doublings in abelian groups of prime power torsion

Let $A$ be a subset of $G$, where $G$ is a finite abelian group of torsion $r$. It was conjectured by Ruzsa that if $|A+A|\leq K|A|$, then $A$ is contained in a coset of $G$ of size at most $r^{CK}|A|$ for some constant $C$. The case $r=2$ received considerable attention in a sequence of papers, and was resolved by Green and Tao. Recently, Even-Zohar and Lovett settled the case when $r$ is a prime. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture when $r$ is a power of prime. In particular, the bound we obtain is tight.

math.CO

Graph Polynomial for Colored Embedded Graphs: A Topological Approach

We study finite graphs embedded in oriented surfaces by associating a polynomial to it. The tools used in developing a theory of such graph polynomials are algebraic topological while the polynomial itself is inspired from ideas arising in physics. We also analyze a variant of these polynomials for colored embedded graphs. This is used to describe the change in the polynomial under basic graph theoretic operations. We conclude with several applications of this polynomial including detection of certain classes of graphs and the connection of this polynomial with topological entanglement entropy.

math.CO

Schur positivity of the spiders $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ via noncommutative symmetric functions

We prove that the spider graphs $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ are Schur positive for all integers $a\ge1$. Together with the known $e$-positivity results, this completes the $e$- and Schur-positivity classification of both families. Our approach uses noncommutative symmetric functions, including a particularly simple ribbon expansion for the path lift with coefficients given by powers of two. We give a new proof of the Shareshian--Wachs path formula at $t=1$ and construct corresponding lifts for spiders. The Littlewood--Richardson rule converts their ribbon expansions into a general Schur-coefficient formula in terms of weighted Yamanouchi words. Mass-preserving multi-injections and a reduction to finitely many inequalities in degree $10$ then prove the required positivity; exact computer verification of these inequalities completes the proof in full generality.

math.CO