Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.01088

Justifying the Volatility of S&P 500 Daily Returns

Hayden Brown
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Over the past 60 years, there has been a gradual increase in the volatility of daily returns for the S&P 500 Index. Hypothetically, suppose that market forces determine daily volatility such that a daily leveraged S&P 500 fund cannot outperform a standard S&P 500 fund in the long run. Then this hypothetical volatility happens to support the increase in volatility seen in the S&P 500 index. On this basis, it appears that the classic argument of the market portfolio being unbeatable in the long run is determining the volatility of S&P 500 daily returns. Moreover, it follows that the long-term volatility of the daily returns for the S&P 500 Index should continue to increase until passing a particular threshold. If, on the other hand, this hypothesis about market forces increasing volatility is invalid, then there is room for daily leveraged S&P 500 funds to outperform their unleveraged counterparts in the long run.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.MF

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hayden Brown. 2024-11-12. Justifying the Volatility of S&P 500 Daily Returns. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01088

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Efficient simulation of a new class of Volterra-type SDEs

We propose a new theoretical framework that exploits convolution kernels to transform a Volterra-type path-dependent (non-Markovian) stochastic process into a standard (Markovian) diffusion process. The transformation is reversible. We discuss existence and path-wise regularity of solutions for our class of stochastic differential equations. In the fractional-kernel case, when $H\in(0,\frac12)$, where $H$ is the Hurst coefficient, we propose a numerical simulation scheme which exhibits a strong convergence rate of order $1/2$, improving upon the rate typically obtained by Euler schemes for stochastic Volterra equations with comparably rough trajectories. This improvement is made possible by the distinctive structure of the proposed class, characterized by a non-Markovian process whose coefficients are driven by an associated Markovian one.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

The skew Brownian motion should not be used as a risk-neutral returns process: a well-posed skew-normal alternative

Return models for risk-neutral financial valuation based on skew Brownian motions (SBMs) have been introduced about twenty years ago, and have recently enjoying growing popularity. Unfortunately, the story behind their development is one of mistakes and erroneous interpretations, beginning from the foundational misrepresentations that the prevalent financial model is based on the Itô-McKean SBM -- which, in fact, it is not. Besides, and more seriously, the clarification of \cite{rossello2012arbitrage} that price models with a local time in their returns, such as the SBM, are arbitrageable has been, by and large, ignored. In this paper, we try to clear the field from the confusions and misconceptions lurking in the standing option pricing literature on SBM, by exposing all the errors we could trace in the treatment so far. Recognizing however the potential of the SBM skew-normal marginals for risk-neutral valuation, as a positive contribution, we reformulate the putative SBM call pricing formula and show that, even if the SBM return model admits arbitrage, its option pricing formula does not. The correct Markovian SDE with skew-normal marginals is then identified, its strong well-posedness shown, and by exploiting the availability of closed formulae, an asymptotic analysis of the implied volatility surface is offered. En route to our conclusions, we obtain a novel normal/skew-normal stochastic dominance property of independent interest.

q-fin.MF↗