Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2403.04247

UltraWiki: Ultra-fine-grained Entity Set Expansion with Negative Seed Entities

Abstract

Entity Set Expansion (ESE) aims to identify new entities belonging to the same semantic class as the given set of seed entities. Traditional methods solely relied on positive seed entities to represent the target fine-grained semantic class, rendering them tough to represent ultra-fine-grained semantic classes. Specifically, merely relying on positive seed entities leads to two inherent shortcomings: (i) Ambiguity among ultra-fine-grained semantic classes. (ii) Inability to define ``unwanted'' semantics. Hence, previous ESE methods struggle to address the ultra-fine-grained ESE (Ultra-ESE) task. To solve this issue, we first introduce negative seed entities in the inputs, which jointly describe the ultra-fine-grained semantic class with positive seed entities. Negative seed entities eliminate the semantic ambiguity by providing a contrast between positive and negative attributes. Meanwhile, it provides a straightforward way to express ``unwanted''. To assess model performance in Ultra-ESE and facilitate further research, we also constructed UltraWiki, the first large-scale dataset tailored for Ultra-ESE. UltraWiki encompasses 50,973 entities and 394,097 sentences, alongside 236 ultra-fine-grained semantic classes, where each class is represented with 3-5 positive and negative seed entities. Moreover, a retrieval-based framework RetExpan and a generation-based framework GenExpan are proposed to provide powerful baselines for Ultra-ESE. Additionally, we devised two strategies to enhance models' comprehension of ultra-fine-grained entities' semantics: contrastive learning and chain-of-thought reasoning. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of our proposed strategies and also reveal that there remains a large space for improvement in Ultra-ESE.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yangning Li, Qingsong Lv, Tianyu Yu, Yinghui Li, Xuming Hu, Wenhao Jiang, Hai-Tao Zheng, Hui Wang. 2025-06-03. UltraWiki: Ultra-fine-grained Entity Set Expansion with Negative Seed Entities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DA-Cramming: Enhancing Cost-Effective Language Model Pretraining with Dependency Agreement Integration

Pretraining language models is still a challenge for many researchers due to its substantial computational costs. As such, there is growing interest in developing more affordable pretraining methods. One notable advancement in this area is the Cramming technique (Geiping and Goldstein, 2022), which enables the pretraining of BERT-style language models using just one GPU in a single day. Building on this innovative approach, we introduce the Dependency Agreement Cramming (DA-Cramming), an efficient framework that integrates information about dependency agreements into the pretraining process. Unlike existing methods that leverage similar semantic information during finetuning, our approach represents a pioneering effort focusing on enhancing the foundational language understanding with semantic information during pretraining. We meticulously design a dual-stage pretraining work flow with four dedicated submodels to capture representative dependency agreements at the chunk level, effectively transforming these agreements into embeddings to benefit the pretraining. Extensive empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous methods across various tasks.

cs.CL

BigO(Bench): Can LLMs Generate Code with Controlled Time and Space Complexity?

We introduce BigO(Bench), a novel coding benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of generative language models in understanding and generating code with specified time and space complexities. This benchmark addresses the gap in current evaluations that often overlook the ability of models to comprehend and produce code constrained by computational complexity. BigO(Bench) includes tooling to infer the algorithmic complexity of any Python function from profiling measurements, including human- or LLM-generated solutions. BigO(Bench) also includes of set of 3,105 coding problems and 1,190,250 solutions from Code Contests annotated with inferred (synthetic) time and space complexity labels from the complexity framework, as well as corresponding runtime and memory footprint values for a large set of input sizes. We present results from evaluating multiple state-of-the-art language models on this benchmark, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in handling complexity requirements. In particular, token-space reasoning models are unrivaled in code generation but not in complexity understanding, hinting that they may not generalize well to tasks for which no reward was given at training time.

cs.CL

SafetyFlow: An Agent-Flow System for Automated LLM Safety Benchmarking

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has intensified the requirement for reliable safety evaluation to uncover model vulnerabilities. To this end, numerous LLM safety evaluation benchmarks are proposed. However, existing benchmarks generally rely on labor-intensive manual curation, which causes excessive time and resource consumption. They also exhibit significant redundancy and limited difficulty. To alleviate these problems, we introduce SafetyFlow, the first agent-flow system designed to automate the construction of LLM safety benchmarks. SafetyFlow can automatically build a comprehensive safety benchmark in only four days without any human intervention by orchestrating seven specialized agents, significantly reducing time and resource cost. Equipped with versatile tools, the agents of SafetyFlow ensure process and cost controllability while integrating human expertise into the automatic pipeline. The final constructed dataset, SafetyFlowBench, contains 23,446 queries with low redundancy and strong discriminative power. Our contribution includes the first fully automated benchmarking pipeline and a comprehensive safety benchmark. We evaluate the safety of 49 advanced LLMs on our dataset and conduct extensive experiments to validate our efficacy and efficiency.

cs.CL