Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Adaptivity Gaps and Approximation Algorithms

Omar El Housni; Ulysse Hennebelle; Alfredo Torrico

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.08929

Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Adaptivity Gaps and Approximation Algorithms

Omar El Housni·Ulysse Hennebelle·Alfredo Torrico

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To address efficiency and design challenges in choice-based matching platforms, we introduce a two-sided assortment optimization framework under general choice preferences. The goal in this problem is to maximize the expected number of matches by deciding which assortments are displayed to the agents and the order in which they are shown. In this context, we identify several classes of policies that platforms can use in their design. Our goals are: (1) to measure the value that one class of policies has over another one, and (2) to approximately solve the optimization problem itself for a given class. For (1), we define the adaptivity gap as the worst-case ratio between the optimal values of two different policy classes. First, we show that the gap between the class of policies that statically show assortments to one-side first and the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to one-side first is exactly $e/(e-1)$. Second, we show that the gap between the latter class of policies and the fully adaptive class of policies that show assortments to agents one by one is exactly $2$. We also note that the worst policies are those who simultaneously show assortments to all the agents. For (2), we first design a polynomial time algorithm that achieves a $1/4$ approximation factor within the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to agents one by one. Furthermore, when agents' preferences are governed by multinomial-logit models, we show that a 0.067 approximation factor can be obtained within the class of policies that show assortments to all agents at once. We further generalize our results to constrained assortment settings, where we impose an upper bound on the size of the displayed assortments. Finally, we present a computational study to evaluate the empirical performance of our theoretical guarantees.

Explore related subjects

math.OC cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Omar El Housni, Ulysse Hennebelle, Alfredo Torrico. 2026-05-06. Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Adaptivity Gaps and Approximation Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08929

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AdGT: Decentralized Gradient Tracking with Adaptive Per-Agent Stepsizes

In decentralized optimization, gradient-tracking methods typically rely on a single global stepsize. This choice can be conservative when agents have local objectives with different smoothness constants, since the stepsize must remain stable for the agent with the largest smoothness constant. This paper proposes AdGT, a decentralized gradient-tracking method in which each agent adapts its own stepsize using local gradient variation and a single global safety factor. The method reduces fixed-stepsize tuning effort and allows agents to exploit local smoothness information during the iterations. For smooth and strongly convex local objectives over undirected networks, we prove that the analyzed AdGT update converges linearly to the exact consensus optimizer. We also study two adaptive stepsize updates that use changes in the gradient-tracking direction. We characterize when the corresponding candidate determines the stepsize and prove conditional lower and upper stepsize bounds and linear convergence under an additional relative tracking-disagreement condition. Experiments on logistic regression, ridge regression, synthetic quadratic problems, and a linear-regression benchmark against state-of-the-art decentralized solvers show that AdGT often reaches a given accuracy in fewer iterations or gradient evaluations than tuned fixed-stepsize GT and the tested baselines, especially under heterogeneous local smoothness. In the topology experiments, each tested AdGT update uses one common safety factor across all graphs, whereas the fixed GT stepsize is tuned separately for each graph and seed.

math.OC↗

arXiv2026

Brockett cost function for symplectic eigenvalues

The sum of symplectic eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of symmetric positive-definite matrices in the sense of Williamson's theorem can be computed via minimization of a trace cost function under the symplecticity constraint. Optimal solutions to this problem only offer a symplectic basis for the symplectic eigenspace corresponding to the sought symplectic eigenvalues. In this note, we introduce a Brockett cost function and investigate its properties and the connection with the symplectic eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the considered matrix. Specifically, we prove that any stationary point consists of symplectic eigenvectors, characterize the saddle points and global minimizers based on which the trace minimization theorem for the symplectic eigenvalues is re-established, and the nonexistence of local nonglobal minimizers is justified.

math.OC↗

arXiv2026

Riemannian Bilevel Optimization with Gradient Aggregation

We study bilevel optimization on Riemannian manifolds when the lower-level solution set is a positive-dimensional submanifold, so that implicit differentiation fails. We propose Riemannian Bilevel Descent Aggregation (RBDA), which extends bilevel descent aggregation to manifolds. Its inner loop aggregates the lower-level descent direction with the upper-level gradient under a decaying multiplier, and its hypergradient is the reverse-mode derivative of the unrolled loop. Under geodesic convexity and quadratic growth of the lower level, the inner iterates converge to a point of the optimistic solution set at a polynomial rate. Approximate minimizers of the objective with a finite number of inner iterations converge to minimizers of the optimistic value. In the experiments RBDA selects the optimistic solution where the implicit and unrolled estimators remain at the initial point or stop at a larger query loss. While each of its outer steps costs more than that of the unrolled estimator, it attains the highest test accuracy in data hyper-cleaning.

math.OC↗