Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2403.18728

Utility of ocean wave parameters in ambient noise prediction

W. Erick Rogers·Laurie T. Fialkowski·Daniel J. Brooker·Gleb Panteleev·Joseph M. Fialkowski
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study is concerned with prediction of the "wind noise" component of ambient noise (AN) in the ocean. It builds on the seminal paper by Felizardo and Melville (1995), in which the authors quantified the correlation between AN and individual wind/wave parameters. Acoustic data are obtained from hydrophones at six diverse locations, and wind/wave parameters are obtained from moored buoys and numerical models. We describe a procedure developed for this study which identifies correlation of AN with wave parameters, independent of their mutual correlation with wind speed. We then describe paired calibration/prediction experiments, whereby multiple wind/wave parameters are used simultaneously to estimate AN. We find that the improvement from inclusion of wave parameters is robust but marginal: typically RMSE is reduced by less than 0.3 dB and/or less than 12% of the original RMSE. We interpret the latter outcome as suggesting that wave breaking responds to changes in local winds quickly, relative to, for example, total wave energy, which develops more slowly. This outcome is consistent with prior knowledge of the physics of wave breaking, e.g. Babanin (2011). We discuss this in context of the time/space response of various wave parameters to wind forcing.

Explore related subjects

physics.ao-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W. Erick Rogers, Laurie T. Fialkowski, Daniel J. Brooker, Gleb Panteleev, Joseph M. Fialkowski. 2024-08-19. Utility of ocean wave parameters in ambient noise prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18728

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Connecting the forward problem to the inverse problem in uncertainty quantification of Earth system models using fast emulators

Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in Earth system model parameterizations is essential to improving their reliability in decision-making. Forward uncertainty propagation is used to derive parameter sensitivity but requires physically plausible parameter distributions first be learned from observations. Bayesian inference offers a principled approach but can become ill-posed when observations weakly constrain parameters--a condition difficult to know prior to inference. Addressing this gap, we show that parameter sensitivity results from forward uncertainty quantification can guide a non-iterative strategy for identifying observations informative to Bayesian calibration. We explore both forward and inverse uncertainty quantification for parameterizations of atmospheric turbulence in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. To overcome the computational bottleneck of $\mathcal{O}(10^5)$ model evaluations required for both analyses, we leverage Gaussian process emulators trained on several hundred WRF simulations. Using these emulators, we conduct a global sensitivity analysis across observation space, investigating how parameter contributions to output variance depend on quantity of interest, atmospheric stability, time-averaging length, and spatial location. We then introduce nondimensional diagnostic measures that systematically identify regions where a parameter's contribution to output variance exceeds observational noise and its independent effect exceeds interaction effects. We demonstrate that observations from these regions serve as a strong proxy for accurate Bayesian calibration and reduced posterior uncertainty. Through emulator-aided Bayesian inversion with synthetic observations, we show how parameter uncertainty can be systematically reduced by leveraging sensitivity information.

physics.ao-ph↗
arXiv2026

High-resolution Calibrated Probabilistic Hourly Precipitation from a Deterministic Forecast

An ``Attention Residual U-Net'' method is described for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting (PQPF) that predicts the hourly probability of no precipitation plus the distribution of positive precipitation from a weighted mixture of two Gamma distributions. The neural network is trained on patches of numerical weather prediction (NWP) hourly precipitation from The Weather Company's convection-permitting GRAF (Global high-Resolution Atmospheric Forecasting) model along with terrain information and column-average relative humidity from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's) Global Forecast System (GFS). The target data are NOAA's Multi-Radar, Multi-Sensor (MRMS) gauge-corrected, quality controlled radar data sampled to the same grid as the GRAF data. The network outputs distributional parameters for each model grid point. Training uses negative log-likelihood as a proper scoring rule, with climatological initialization for stable convergence. Inference is performed as a single forward pass over the contiguous United States (CONUS) domain, with edge-replication padding to satisfy the network's spatial-divisibility requirement. The subsequent forecasts are spatially detailed, highly reliable, and skillful with respect to climatology and a simpler reference forecast method. The method is particularly useful for estimating probabilities in regions with large terrain variation.

physics.ao-ph↗
arXiv2026

Improving precipitation forecasts in an AI weather model using observational data

Artificial intelligence weather prediction systems now surpass state-of-the-art physical models for medium-range forecasting. However, because these models are trained almost exclusively on historical climate reanalyses, they inherit pervasive structural biases, particularly for precipitation. Here we fine-tune a global graph-transformer architecture directly on high-resolution, satellite-derived precipitation observations. The resulting model reduces global medium-range probabilistic forecasting errors by up to 19% and improves extreme rainfall prediction accuracy by 57% over current operational models. It additionally demonstrates superior skill for tropical storms and drizzle events, though a physics-based operational model remains more reliable for the heaviest precipitation events. Our results demonstrate that incorporating observation-based data directly into training can substantially improve precipitation forecasts.

physics.ao-ph↗